Скачать или смотреть How to Access the Base Class in C# : A Guide for Unit Testing Legacy Code

Learn how to effectively manage `base class` functionality in C# to create unit tests without complex refactoring.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68395440/ asked by the user 'ilitirit' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9825/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68395485/ provided by the user 'Jon Skeet' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/22656/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Is there a way to get a reference to the base class in C# ?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Challenge: Accessing the Base Class in C#

When working with legacy code in C# , developers often face unique challenges. One common problem is how to handle the base class functionality during unit testing. With the rise of agile methodologies, unit tests are essential for ensuring that changes don't introduce new bugs. However, in cases where the base class interacts with external resources—like databases—it can be cumbersome to adjust the test conditions without a major code overhaul.

In this post, we'll explain how you can effectively manage base class functionality in C# while creating unit tests, especially when the standard methods of accessing the base class do not suffice.

The Problem: Creating Unit Tests for Legacy Code

Imagine you are working on a class that overrides a method from its base class. You want the flexibility to decide whether to call the base class's implementation or your own custom logic at runtime. However, directly accessing the base class functionality through the base keyword restricts your testing capabilities, especially when you want to use a surrogate for the base class.

Example Scenario

You have a base method that looks like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This approach poses a problem, as the base keyword cannot be used in conjunction with any replacement or surrogate class as shown. So, what's the solution?

The Solution: Conditional Method Calls

While you can't directly combine these two approaches, there is a practical workaround. Instead of trying to call them in a single line, you can manage your method calls using a simple condition. Here’s how you can implement this:

Implementation Steps

Check for Surrogate: Before calling the base class method, check if your surrogate class is null.

Call Based on Check: If the surrogate exists, call its DoSomething method; otherwise, call the base class method.

Sample Code

Here's how the refactored code would look:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Why This Works

Simple Checks: By using a simple if statement, you manage the call to either the base class or the surrogate without complex refactoring.

Controlled Execution: This approach allows you to maintain control over which implementation is invoked based on the context—ideal for unit tests.

Alternative Considerations

While the solution above is effective, remember that it can lead to more complex code if overused. In scenarios where this pattern is frequent, consider refactoring your design to incorporate Dependency Injection (DI) or using design patterns like Strategy or Command that lend themselves well to testing and flexibility.

Conclusion

Managing base class functionality in C# when dealing with legacy code can pose significant challenges, particularly during unit testing. By using conditional checks to determine which implementation to call, you can effectively test your changes without performing a complex refactor.

This simple, yet often overlooked, approach can save you significant time and effort while ensuring your code remains testable and maintainable. Remember to continually evaluate your code structure for areas where enhancements can lead to better testing practices in the future.

For C# developers grappling with legacy systems, mastering these techniques is crucial for balancing quality and efficiency in your code evolution.