Скачать или смотреть Understanding C+ + Inline Virtual Functions in Polymorphism

A comprehensive guide to understanding whether `C+ + ` accepts inline virtual functions while performing polymorphism, including practical examples and best practices.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64634658/ asked by the user 'sakugawa' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13967666/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64636154/ provided by the user 'Pete Becker' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1593860/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Does C+ + accept inline virtual function while performing polymorphism?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding C+ + Inline Virtual Functions in Polymorphism

Polymorphism is a fundamental concept in C+ + that allows methods to do different things based on the object it is acting upon, even if they share the same name. However, when it comes to inline virtual functions, confusion often arises. Specifically, does C+ + accept inline virtual functions during polymorphism? In this post, we will delve into this question, analyze the code involved, and clarify the associated best practices.

The Problem Defined

The central question looks into the compatibility of inline functions with the mechanisms of polymorphism in C+ + . Consider a scenario where we declare virtual functions in a base class and its derived class and mark them as inline. While it may seem feasible, one might encounter complications, particularly during linking due to duplicate definitions if not handled properly.

To illustrate, let's break down the provided example:

Sample Code

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this code, inline virtual functions are defined within the header file. While this compiles successfully in MSVC and g+ + , removing the inline keyword will lead to linker errors due to the One Definition Rule (ODR), as the function will be defined multiple times across different translation units.

Analyzing the Solution

Utilizing inline and ODR

The inline keyword in C+ + serves as a hint to the compiler that the function can have multiple identical definitions across different files. This becomes significant in managing linkage when virtual functions are involved:

When Inline Works: When marked as inline, it informs the compiler that the same function implementation can appear in multiple files, alleviating ODR violations.

When Inline Fails: Without inline, if the virtual function is defined in multiple files, the linker will throw an error, indicating duplicate definitions.

Best Practices for Function Definitions

To avoid the pitfalls associated with inline virtual functions, consider these best practices:

Define Inline Functions in the Header:

If you choose to use inline, keep the definitions in the header file. Be cautious of maintaining dependencies, as any change necessitates recompiling all files that include the header.

Separate Definitions for Non-inline Functions:

If you choose not to mark your functions as inline, define them in a single source file. For example, refactor the source2.cpp file:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this structure:

header.h contains only the class definitions,

The implementation of member functions is managed within their respective source files.

Conclusion

In conclusion, C+ + does accept inline virtual functions with a careful understanding of ODR and proper function definitions. While using inline can simplify some aspects of code management, it’s essential to balance this with the potential for increased compilation overhead and risks of linkage issues. Following the best practices discussed will ensure your applications run smoothly and maintainably.

By managing the definitions of virtual functions carefully, you can harness the power of polymorphism in C+ + effectively. Happy coding!