Скачать или смотреть This Is How CANADA Is Ending U.S. DOMINATION — How Bad Is This?

In response to U.S. tariffs and Trump’s threats to annex Canada, 71% of Canadians now say they’ll buy fewer American products — and the effects are massive. From grocery stores in Toronto to border towns in Buffalo, from California vineyards to Tesla showrooms in Europe, the boycott of U.S. goods is reshaping trade, tourism, and trust.

📉 The U.S. could lose up to $90 billion in 2025 — equal to 0.3% of its GDP — as Canadian shoppers, travelers, and even European consumers reject American brands. California wines, U.S. spirits, and even household names like Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, and Tesla are being pushed out.

What started as a reaction to tariffs is now a movement: “Buy Canada”. Canadian chains are delisting U.S. products, provinces are banning American alcohol, and travel to the U.S. has dropped by nearly half. Even Europe is joining in — with Tesla sales plunging 28% and McDonald’s facing boycotts.

🔥 Is this just a temporary political protest… or the beginning of the end of U.S. domination in global trade?

In This Video:

✅ Why Canadian consumers are boycotting U.S. goods
✅ How tariffs and Trump’s threats triggered the backlash
✅ Which industries (alcohol, tourism, Tesla, fast food) are hit hardest
✅ The hidden cost: jobs, GDP, and America’s global reputation
✅ Whether these changes are temporary or permanent

🔔 Subscribe now for more fearless breakdowns of global economics, trade wars, and the truth behind the headlines. We don’t sugarcoat — we expose what others won’t.

📌 What do YOU think? Is this boycott just politics, or a permanent shift away from U.S. dominance? Drop your thoughts in the comments below.

#USABoycott #CanadaVsUSA #TradeWar #GlobalEconomy #Trump #USBrands #BuyCanada #Tesla #McDonalds #CocaCola
-------------------------------------------------------
⚠️ Copyright Disclaimers
• We use images and content in accordance with the YouTube Fair Use copyright guidelines
• Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”
• This video could contain certain copyrighted video clips, pictures, or photographs that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.