Скачать или смотреть Possible Worlds: Unpacking Modality and Reality

The source explores the philosophical concept of modality, which differentiates between contingent truths (things that could have been otherwise) and necessary truths (things that must be true). It introduces possible worlds as a framework to understand these distinctions, explaining that a necessary truth holds in all possible worlds, while a contingent truth is true in some but not all. The discussion then addresses Quine's challenge to essential properties by demonstrating how the possible worlds framework resolves the paradox. Finally, the source examines two major philosophical views on the nature of possible worlds: one proposing they are abstract constructs (Kripke and Plantinga) and another positing they are concrete, equally real universes (Lewis), with implications for personal identity across these realities.

Glossary of Key Terms
Accidental Property: A property an individual possesses in the actual world, but which they do not necessarily possess in all other possible worlds where they exist. It is not fundamental to their identity.
Actual World: The specific possible world that we currently inhabit and experience as reality.
Abstract View (of Possible Worlds): The philosophical position, associated with thinkers like Kripke and Plantinga, that possible worlds are non-physical, conceptual entities, like blueprints or descriptions of how things could be.
Actuality (Lewis's View): An indexical term, similar to "here" or "now," that refers to whichever possible world the speaker happens to be located in. No single world is inherently more "actual" than others.
Concrete View (of Possible Worlds): The philosophical position, primarily advocated by David Lewis, that possible worlds are genuine, physically existent universes, distinct from our own but equally real.
Contingent Truth: A statement that is true in the actual world but could have been false; its truth is not necessary and depends on specific circumstances or historical events.
Counterpart Theory: David Lewis's solution to identity across possible worlds, stating that an individual in one world does not literally exist in other worlds. Instead, there are "counterparts"—distinct, but very similar, individuals in other concrete universes—who fulfill the role of "you" in those worlds.
Essential Property: A property that an individual must possess in every possible world where that individual exists. It is considered fundamental and defining of their identity.
Modality: The philosophical framework concerned with concepts of possibility, necessity, contingency, and impossibility. It categorizes truths based on their flexibility or fixedness.
Necessary Truth: A statement that is true in all possible worlds; it could not possibly be false and is true out of sheer unshakable necessity.
Possible Worlds: Hypothetical or actual complete ways reality could have been. They serve as a tool in modal logic and metaphysics to understand and define possibility and necessity.
Quine's Paradox (Mathematician/Cyclist Paradox): A logical puzzle posed by W.V. Quine to challenge the coherence of essential properties, illustrating how a single person could seemingly possess the same property (e.g., being bipedal) both essentially and accidentally, leading to a contradiction.