Скачать или смотреть Hindi - Supreme Court on POCSO Age Proof: School Certificate vs. Medical Test State of UP v. Anurudh

In a significant 2026 judgment, the Supreme Court of India has settled a critical conflict in criminal law: When determining a victim's age in POCSO cases, does a medical bone density test override a school certificate? This ruling in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Anurudh & Anr. addresses the rising concern of "Romeo-Juliet" cases—consensual relationships between adolescents that are criminalized due to age disputes.
This video provides a detailed legal analysis of the judgment, explaining why the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order for mandatory medical testing. We explore the statutory hierarchy under Section 94 of the Juvenile Justice Act, the limits of a High Court's jurisdiction under Section 439 CrPC (Bail), and the Supreme Court's urgent suggestion to the Government regarding consensual teenage relationships.

Key Legal Provisions Analyzed:
Section 94 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012
Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)
Ossification Test / Medical Age Determination rules
This video is essential for law students, criminal defense attorneys, judicial aspirants, and anyone interested in the intersection of medical science and Indian law.
Disclaimer:
This video is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information provided is based on the court's judgment and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with a qualified legal professional. Case facts and legal interpretations can be complex and specific to individual circumstances.

#SupremeCourt, #POCSOAct, #LegalExplainer, #StateOfUPvAnurudh, #AgeDetermination, #Section94JJAct, #RomeoJulietLaws, #IndianLaw, #CriminalLaw, #OssificationTest, #BailJurisprudence, #LawStudent, #HighCourtJudgment, #LegalEducation, #JurisOptima