Learn how to effectively wrap types in Rust using `newtype` while managing access to inner fields flexibly, similar to properties in Python.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/75981574/ asked by the user 'davidA' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/143397/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/75981708/ provided by the user 'drewtato' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6274355/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: When wrapping a type with Rust's newtype, how can inner fields be exposed or themselves wrapped?
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Newtype in Rust: How to Manage Inner Fields in Your Own Type
As a newcomer to Rust, you may find the concept of structs and their associated named fields particularly useful. However, challenges arise when trying to wrap third-party types, such as glam::f64::DVec4, into your custom types, like Tuple. You may want to control the methods and access cleanly without losing the benefits of named fields. In this guide, we'll break down how to effectively achieve this using Rust's newtype pattern.
The Problem: Wrapping Types and Accessing Inner Fields
Suppose we want to create a new type, Tuple, that wraps the DVec4 type from the Glam library. One key challenge here is how to access the fields of the inner type after wrapping. While direct access like a.x or a.y is possible with regular structs, once we wrap DVec4 in Tuple, accessing these fields directly becomes non-trivial.
Here's an example of how we might start wrapping DVec4:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
As shown above, while creating the Tuple, we can no longer access fields using dot notation (e.g., a.x) directly. Instead, you may resort to using accessor methods or the cumbersome Tuple.0.x syntax.
The Solution: Leveraging Methods and Traits
Create Getter Methods: To make the fields of Tuple accessible, you can implement getter methods for each field. This mimics the feel of "properties" found in other languages, such as Python.
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
This approach enables you to retain clarity and maintain a clean API when interacting with your Tuple type. Now, you can access the fields like this:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Implement Traits for Generic Use: For added versatility, you can implement various traits for your Tuple type.
AsRef<DVec4> and AsMut<DVec4>: This allows seamless interfacing between Tuple and DVec4, enhancing generic functionality in your code.
Comparison Traits: Implementing traits like PartialEq helps to compare Tuple instances directly with other Tuple or DVec4 instances, simplifying usage.
Conversion Traits: By implementing From for Tuple, you can easily convert between your custom type and the underlying type.
Conclusion: Embracing Rust's Structs
While Rust's approach to wrapping types using newtype has its limitations, it also encourages a clean separation of concerns. By implementing getter methods and utilizing traits, you can maintain accessibility to wrapped fields without losing the structured benefits of Rust.
The takeaway? Embrace Rust's strengths while finding flexible solutions to potential hurdles when managing inner fields of wrapped types. With these tactics, you can enjoy the intricacies of Rust's type system without sacrificing ease of use.
Информация по комментариям в разработке