Скачать или смотреть Mocking Dependency Test: Why Verify Method Invocation Fails

Discover the common pitfalls of mocking dependencies in .NET testing, and learn how to ensure your verification methods pass successfully.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64531501/ asked by the user 'Asynchronous' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1044581/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64531580/ provided by the user 'mstaessen' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1323798/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Mocking dependency Test passing but Verify method invocation failing

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Challenge with Mocking Dependencies in .NET Testing

When diving into unit testing, especially in a .NET environment, developers often run into issues when dealing with mocking dependencies. A common scenario arises in a test setup, where the test passes, but the verification of method invocation does not perform as expected. This conundrum can be particularly perplexing for those working with frameworks such as .NET Core or .NET Framework.

The Case at Hand

Let's explore an example that reflects this issue. Suppose you're testing a method called IsValidPhoneNumber, which checks if a phone number contains ten digits. Here's what the method looks like:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You have set up your test class for a view model that relies on mocked dependencies, including a method to validate the phone number. Although the assertion for validity passes, an attempt to verify if the method was invoked results in a failure. This indicates there's something off with how the mocking is being executed.

The Current Test Setup

Here’s the complete setup in your test class:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Now, let’s suppose that when you add a verification line to check if the phone number validation was invoked, it fails:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Why is This Happening?

The Core Issue: Overriding Method Implementations

The problem lies in the method overriding within your test setup. When you mock _customerViewModel to return a specific value for the IsValidPhoneNumber method, you're effectively replacing the original implementation. Therefore, when you check if the mocked method was invoked, it fails because the method you wanted to track was not the one being executed by your system under test (SUT).

Key Takeaways

Mock Dependencies, Don’t Mock the SUT: It’s crucial to understand that while you can mock dependencies in your tests, you should not replace the actual logic of the method you are trying to validate. This can lead to misleading results and ineffective tests.

Test for Meaning: Your unit tests should be meaningful representations of actual method invocations. If your test setup does not imitate realistic behavior, you may end up testing the mocks rather than the method's true functionality.

Conclusion: Building Better Unit Tests

In summary, unit testing — especially when it comes to mocking dependencies — requires a clear understanding of what you are testing. To ensure your tests are robust and accurate:

Always test the actual implementation of methods within your SUT while relying on mocks for dependencies.

Avoid overriding the function you intend to verify to maintain the integrity of your testing process.

With these principles in mind, you can build more reliable tests that not only pass but also verify correct behavior effectively.