Скачать или смотреть Improving mmap Performance in C: Techniques to Prefetch Data Efficiently

Discover effective strategies for enhancing `mmap` performance using C. Learn about creating a key index and employing binary search for faster data retrieval.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63386030/ asked by the user 'user12986714' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12986714/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63411180/ provided by the user 'Gonbidatu' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14104682/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Prefetch with file backed mmap in c

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Improving mmap Performance in C: Techniques to Prefetch Data Efficiently

In performance-critical applications, utilizing memory-mapped files through mmap in C can often lead to challenges, especially when dealing with large files. A common problem arises when data retrieval becomes disk-bound due to inefficient access patterns, resulting in slow performance caused by random disk I/O. This guide will explore a specific dilemma: how to optimize performance in C code when accessing large mmap-ed files, including techniques for efficient data prefetching.

Understanding the Problem

In our scenario, we're dealing with a tight loop that continually dereferences a pointer to data within a sizable memory-mapped file (~100 GB in size). The code functions as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Profiling indicates that performance bottlenecks occur primarily at the point where the pointer is dereferenced, leading to detrimental random disk I/O.

Potential Solutions Explored

Several approaches have been considered, including:

Using __builtin_prefetch() to optimize cache usage.

Utilizing madvise() to inform the kernel about anticipated data needs.

However, performance issues persisted, with madvise() calls becoming a significant overhead in processing time and __builtin_prefetch() proving inadequate for mmap-ed memory.

Proposed Solution: Optimize Data Access Patterns

Given the challenges posed by the current implementation, an innovative strategy involves restructuring the data access to improve locality and reduce random memory accesses. Here are the steps to accomplish this:

1. Create a Memory-Mapped Key Index File

Instead of accessing records randomly, generate a separate memory-mapped file that contains a sorted index of keys and their corresponding offsets. This allows for much faster lookups since the keys are organized:

The key index file records key-value pairs and their offsets from the primary data file.

A binary search can be employed on this sorted key index, guaranteeing roughly O(log N) time complexity for accessing specific keys.

2. Consider Partitioned Binary Search Trees

If your application involves modifying keys during the operation, a flat file approach may not be suitable. Instead, consider implementing a partitioned binary search tree using array structure:

Fixed-size Partitions: Split the index file into manageable blocks (e.g., 64 kB).

Balanced Structure: Within each partition, maintain a balanced arrangement of keys to enhance locality.

This ensures that searches remain efficient while reducing non-sequential disk access.

3. Efficiently Managing Duplicates

For cases with duplicate keys, incorporate a secondary index file. Each duplicate can refer to a chain of entries, allowing you to manage records without overwhelming storage costs:

The primary index contains only unique keys.

The secondary index can effectively track duplicate keys with minimal space overhead.

Conclusion: Emphasizing Code Complexity vs. Performance Gain

By restructuring how we access the large memory-mapped file, we significantly reduce the overhead associated with random disk accesses. Although this solution introduces added code complexity, the overall performance enhancements—achieved through improved locality—can be dramatic.

When dealing with large datasets in performance-sensitive applications, prioritizing efficient data structures and retrieval methods is key to unlocking better performance. Implementing a robust key indexing system in conjunction with effective search algorithms can provide significant gains without incurring the high costs of multithreading or complex prefetching directly from disk.

In conclusion, it is essential to asse