Скачать или смотреть Understanding the defaultdict Behavior in Python: Fixing Shared Instances dictionary Problem

Learn how to correctly implement Python's `defaultdict` to avoid shared instances of the same dictionary across keys. Dive into the solution for nested defaultdicts in Python.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/71679139/ asked by the user 'jboges' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7948380/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/71679259/ provided by the user 'Cameron Riddell' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14278448/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Python Defaultdict with defined dictionary as default value shares the same dictionary between keys

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the defaultdict Behavior in Python: Fixing Shared Instances of dictionary Problem

In Python, the defaultdict is a powerful tool that simplifies the process of creating dictionaries with default values. However, when you nest defaultdicts and share instances of another dictionary, you might encounter some unexpected behavior. In this post, we will dissect a common issue with shared instances in nested defaultdicts and provide a clear solution.

The Problem

Imagine you are working with a nested defaultdict, where you intend to store specific key-value pairs as default values. The goal is to have unique dictionaries for each key; however, if you mistakenly share the same dictionary reference across keys, modifying one key will inadvertently modify the others.

Consider the following code snippet:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

With this setup, when you update individual keys like so:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You will find that userDict looks something like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Here, you'll notice that the shared instance of counter_format results in unexpected counts across the different keys in your defaultdict.

The Solution

To fix this, you simply need to ensure that a new instance of the counter_format dictionary is created each time you access a missing value in the innermost defaultdict. Instead of defining counter_format outside the lambda function, include it inside the lambda. This guarantees that each key in your nested defaultdict gets its own independent dictionary. Here's how you can modify the code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Resulting Output

Now, if you check the state of userDict, you will observe that it properly reflects individual values for each key:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

Understanding how defaultdict manages instances is crucial for Python developers aiming to maintain clean and bug-free code. By ensuring each instance of counter_format is created within the lambda, you avoid any unwanted side effects from shared dictionaries, allowing your application to function as intended.

With this tip, your next project using nested defaultdict should be much smoother. Happy coding!