Скачать или смотреть Understanding the bytes Field in Protobuf Structures: A Deep Dive into Encoding and Decoding

Discover how to effectively use the `bytes` field in Protobuf structures and understand the implications of encoding and decoding.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/69659206/ asked by the user 'vl4deee11' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13000040/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/69659339/ provided by the user 'Marc Gravell' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/23354/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Protobuf structure with bytes field

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Protobuf Structures with a bytes Field

Protobuf, or Protocol Buffers, is a method developed by Google for serializing structured data. It’s widely used in communications protocols, data storage, and more due to its efficiency and simplicity. However, one common question that arises among developers is how to effectively utilize the bytes field in a Protobuf structure, particularly when encoding and decoding data. In this post, we’ll look into the specific example of combining Protobuf messages with a bytes field and the consequences of doing so.

The Problem Definition

Let's look at a specific example where we have two Protobuf messages defined as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The scenario presents itself when one might want to fill the bytes field in message A with the encoded data of message B. This leads us to an important question: How true is this process of encoding and decoding, and what are the possible consequences?

The Encoding Process

Step-by-Step Breakdown

Create Instances of Both Messages:
First, an instance of message A and message B is created. Here’s a sample pseudocode:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Marshall Message B:
The next step encodes message B into a byte format. This is done using a marshalling function, which converts structured data into a format suitable for transmission or storage.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Store Encoded Data in Message A:
The byte array obtained from encoding B is then assigned to the bytes B field in message A.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Marshall Message A:
Finally, we encode message A into a binary format using the same marshalling function.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Decoding Process

For decoding, we can perform the following steps:

Unmarshall Message A:
When retrieving data, we first decode the bytes back into message A.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Unmarshall the bytes Field:
The next step involves decoding the bytes field back into message B:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Comparison of Structures

At the payload level, storing the encoded B in A as a bytes type behaves exactly like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This shows that the two approaches are functionally equivalent.

Conclusion: No Consequences, Just Convenience

Ultimately, there are no adverse consequences to using a bytes field in this way. This approach is entirely valid and behaves in the same manner as directly embedding message B within message A. However, it might be more convenient and clearer to define B as a field within A if the context allows, as it enhances readability and maintainability of your code.

Key Takeaways

The use of bytes for storing encoded messages is completely viable and has no operational issues.

It might be more intuitive to embed message B directly into message A for better clarity.

Leveraging the bytes field in Protobuf can be an effective strategy as long as you understand its implications and alternatives.

By grasping these concepts, you can confidently implement Protobuf structures in your data-heavy applications.