Sexual Economics Theory vs. Feminist Theory | MGTOW, INCEL, & Science

This video attempts to answer several questions: What is the difference between sexual economics theory (SET) and feminist theory? How do the MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) and INCEL (involuntarily celibate or involuntary celibate) philosophies connect with sexual economics theory? Which theory has more empirical support? The factors and dynamics of sexuality have been explained by many different models including a biological and a political model. The political model, known as social construction, is often referenced by the feminist theory of sexuality. A third way to conceptualize sexuality would be through an economics model, which is sometimes referred to as social exchange theory or sexual economics theory. A related construct is called sexual market value, which is simply a value determined when operating under sexual economics theory.


Baumeister, R. F., Reynolds, T., Winegard, B., & Vohs, K. D. (2017). Competing for love: Applying sexual economics theory to mating contests. Journal of Economic Psychology, 63, 230–241.

Baumeister, R., & Vohs, K. (2012). Sexual Economics, Culture, Men, and Modern Sexual Trends. Society, 49(6), 520.

Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual Economics: Sex as Female Resource for Social Exchange in Heterosexual Interactions. Personality & Social Psychology Review (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 8(4), 339–363.

Rudman, L. A., & Fetterolf, J. C. (2014). Gender and sexual economics: Do women view sex as a female commodity? Psychological Science, 25(7), 1438–1447.

Fetterolf, J. C., & Rudman, L. A. (2017). Exposure to sexual economics theory promotes a hostile view of heterosexual relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(1), 77–88.

Rudman, L. A. (2017). Myths of Sexual Economics Theory: Implications for Gender Equality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(3), 299–313.