Скачать или смотреть Understanding Unexpected Behavior with json.dumps() in a Python int Subclass

Discover how to create a custom subclass of `int` in Python that behaves correctly with `json.dumps()`, while understanding potential pitfalls and alternative approaches.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62439711/ asked by the user 'Rob Kwasowski' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8569209/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62439823/ provided by the user 'Grismar' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4390160/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Creating a subclass of int, unexpected behaviour with json.dumps()

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Creating a Custom Subclass of int in Python: Solving JSON Serialization Issues

When working with Python, you may want to customize built-in types to suit specific needs in your programming projects. For instance, creating a subclass of int allows you to retain the mathematical properties of integers while also giving them custom string representations. However, doing this can sometimes lead to unexpected behaviors, particularly when serializing objects to JSON format using json.dumps().

In this guide, we'll explore a common issue that arises when subclassing int and how to troubleshoot it.

The Problem: Subclassing int and JSON Serialization

Consider the following scenario: you want to create a subclass of int called xint that prints as a string but can still be utilized as an integer mathematically. Here's the initial implementation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

With this setup, you might expect that when you convert an object of xint to JSON, it would retain the string formatting you defined. For instance:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, the output is surprising:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

So, why does this happen?

Understanding the Behavior: Why json.dumps() Returns an Integer

The json.dumps() function serializes Python objects to JSON format. In our case, the xint subclass is still fundamentally an integer, meaning that when json.dumps() encounters an instance of xint, it recognizes it as an int rather than a custom type. Therefore, it serializes it using its default behavior for integers, resulting in output that does not reflect the custom string representation.

The Core Issue

Type Recognition: When json processes the xint object, it recognizes it as an integer (due to inheritance) and treats it as such.

String Representation: Although you've overridden the _str_ method to change how the object is printed, this does not affect its fundamental type when it comes to JSON serialization.

A Proposed Solution: Custom Serialization

To make json.dumps() treat your subclass as a string, you could implement a custom serialization method. Here's an approach that adjusts how xint is represented during serialization:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Important Considerations

Compatibility: Converting xint to a string for JSON representation may limit its usefulness in mathematical contexts.

Redefining Behavior: The custom method to_json allows flexibility but alters the expected functionality. Be cautious of your use case.

Conclusion: Rethinking Your Approach

If you encounter this issue while designing your subclass, it's worth stepping back and reassessing your initial problem. Ask yourself:

What are you trying to achieve by creating a subclass of int?

Are there alternative approaches to represent or manage your data?

It’s crucial to clarify your objectives and understand the potential limitations of subclassing built-in types. This can save you time and reduce complexity in your implementation.

With this guide, you should now have a better understanding of the unexpected behaviors you might face when subclassing int and how to work around them when using json.dumps(). Happy coding!