Скачать или смотреть Trump Is RIGGING the Courts - And He Just Got CAUGHT

What’s happening right now inside the federal court system is not normal—and it’s not subtle.
This video breaks down how Donald Trump and his Justice Department are accused of rigging federal court assignments to ensure that political enemies are prosecuted in front of handpicked judges, rather than judges selected through neutral, random processes.
At the center of this unfolding legal battle is John Brennan, who is now fighting back after learning that prosecutors may be steering his case to a single Trump-appointed judge in Florida.
A detailed legal filing submitted to the court alleges that prosecutors are exploiting a loophole in the federal system by filing cases in Fort Pierce, Florida, a division with only one active judge: Aileen Cannon.
Judge Cannon, appointed by Trump in the final weeks of his first term, previously:
Granted Trump extraordinary relief before he was charged
Was reversed by a conservative appeals court
Refused to recuse herself from Trump’s classified documents case
Ultimately dismissed that case on a fringe legal theory before Trump returned to office
Now, Brennan’s attorneys allege the Trump Justice Department is attempting to route prosecutions of Trump’s critics to the same judge—guaranteeing the outcome before a trial even begins.
This video explains:
How federal judge assignments are supposed to work
The Fort Pierce loophole and why it matters
Trump’s public threats against Brennan and other former officials
The pattern of indictments against Trump critics including James Comey, John Bolton, and Letitia James
Why Brennan’s legal team moved preemptively to expose the alleged court-shopping scheme
What this means for judicial independence and the rule of law
The filing asks for a simple assurance: that Brennan’s case will be heard by a judge chosen through neutral and impartial processes, not by prosecutorial maneuvering designed to guarantee a favorable judge.
So far, the Justice Department has not given that assurance.
This video lays out the documented pattern, the legal mechanics, and the high-stakes implications of a system where a president can allegedly threaten prosecution—and then watch it happen in front of judges chosen to deliver the result he wants.
All analysis is based on court filings, public statements, documented timelines, and established federal procedure, not speculation. Viewers are encouraged to review the facts and draw their own conclusions.

DISCLOSURE: This video uses AI-generated visuals and voice. Tom Brennan is a real journalist/analyst using AI technology as a presentation tool. All research, analysis, fact-checking, and editorial decisions are conducted by a real person. The content, opinions, and conclusions presented are human-generated.