Скачать или смотреть How to Asynchronously Increment a Variable in Python for Performance Boost

Discover effective strategies to asynchronously increment a variable in Python using multithreading, and maximize performance!
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68667524/ asked by the user 'Ξένη Γήινος' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/16383578/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68667749/ provided by the user 'Adam Smooch' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/10761353/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Python asynchronously increment the same variable to boost performance?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Asynchronously Increment a Variable in Python for Performance Boost

Introduction

When it comes to optimizing performance in Python, using multiple threads to independently increment a variable appears attractive. However, if you've tried it, you might have noticed that asynchronously incrementing the same variable doesn't yield the performance improvements you expect. In fact, it could take much longer than a straightforward synchronous approach. Let's delve into why this happens and explore a more effective way to utilize multithreading in your Python programs.

Understanding the Problem

At first glance, you might think that using multithreading could significantly speed up processes, particularly for tasks like incrementing a variable. In your initial code snippet, you attempted to use 100 threads to increment a shared variable num 10,000 times:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

While you correctly arrived at the intended total of 10,000, the execution time was dramatically longer than the synchronous version. Here’s what may have gone wrong.

The Myth of Multithreading Efficiency

Multi-threading Limitations:

The performance boost from threading isn’t as linear as many expect. For example, on a machine with a 4-core CPU, increasing from 1 thread to 4 threads may reduce computation time, but it won't be a direct 75% reduction. Operating system overhead always plays a role in diminishing returns.

Resource Management:

When the number of threads exceeds the number of physical cores (denoted as t > nc), performance can suffer. In practical scenarios, managing multiple threads can introduce additional complexity and slow down the process due to context switching and resource contention.

Shared Resources:

Using a single global variable that multiple threads modify concurrently adds complexity. You need mechanisms like mutexes or semaphores to ensure that updates happen correctly. The more threads accessing shared resources, the higher the chances of performance degradation.

Best Practices for Asynchronous Processing

To effectively harness the power of multithreading in Python, consider these best practices:

1. Limit the Number of Threads

Aim to match the number of threads to the number of CPU cores (e.g., t = nc). This way, each thread can efficiently use a core without overwhelming the system.

For optimal performance, consider using t = (nc - 1) to leave some resources available for the operating system and background processes.

2. Avoid Shared State

Instead of having multiple threads modify a single variable, divide the workload. For example:

Assign specific ranges of the increment tasks to each thread:

Thread A: processes 0–24

Thread B: processes 25–49

Thread C: processes 50–74

Thread D: processes 75–99

This method eliminates the need for synchronization since each thread works independently on its segment of the problem space, leading to a more efficient execution.

Conclusion

Ultimately, multithreading doesn't guarantee performance increases and can actually introduce more complexity than expected. To summarize:

Only use as many threads as you have cores, or just slightly fewer.

Avoid shared variables where possible; divide tasks among threads clearly to ensure they don't need to synchronize.

By following these recommendations, you'll harness the power of Python's multithreading capabilities more effectively, resulting in better performance and a smoother coding experience.