Скачать или смотреть Understanding the API Status Code for Failed Jobs

Explore how to effectively communicate job failures through API status codes beyond the standard HTTP responses.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62948407/ asked by the user 'Dom J' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13803926/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62948559/ provided by the user 'Alexander Ushakov' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4915707/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: API status code for failed, previously started job

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the API Status Code for Failed Jobs: A Comprehensive Guide

In the world of API development, the proper handling of status codes is crucial for communicating the status of operations effectively. One common scenario developers face is how to signal a job failure when processing a user-initiated job. In this guide, we will explore this problem and provide a clear and structured solution.

The Problem: How to Indicate a Job Failure

When building an API that allows users to create jobs, the typical workflow includes:

Sending a POST request to /jobs to create a job, which returns a 201 Created with the job ID.

Checking the job status via a GET request to /jobs/{id}, where:

A 204 No Content is returned if the job is still processing.

A 200 OK is returned along with the job results when the job is complete.

However, an exceptional situation arises when a job fails during processing. In this case, the job still exists (the job ID is valid), but it hasn't completed successfully. The challenge is to find a suitable HTTP status code that accurately reflects this situation.

The Solution: Recommendations for Status Codes

Avoid 4xx Client Errors

First and foremost, it's critical to avoid using 4xx status codes, as these are reserved for client-side errors. A 4xx implies that the client has made a bad request, which is not the case here—the request was correct, but the job processing has failed.

Avoid 5xx Server Errors

Similarly, returning a 5xx status code, such as 500 Internal Server Error, would be misleading in this context, as it suggests that there is an issue with the server handling the request. Instead, the server knows that the job itself has failed, not that there is a problem with the request handling.

Custom Response or Alternative Status Codes

To handle job failures gracefully, consider one of the following strategies:

Use a Custom Response with 200 Status Code:

Return a 200 OK response, but include a clear message in the response body that indicates the job has failed. This allows the API consumers to receive a consistent status code while providing the necessary context about the job failure.

Example response:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Consider Using Status Code 205 Reset Content:

If you wish to stick with HTTP status codes, you might consider using the 205 Reset Content status code. This code indicates that the server has successfully processed the request, but no content is being returned. You can supplement this with an informative message in the response body to clarify that the job has failed.

Conclusion

Effectively communicating job status in your API is essential for enhancing user experience and transparency. While the challenge of indicating a job failure does not neatly fit into existing HTTP status codes, you can creatively use a 200 OK response with a detailed error message or consider employing the 205 Reset Content code. By following these guidelines, your API users will have a better understanding of job statuses, making your API more intuitive and user-friendly.

Now that you have a clear understanding of how to indicate job failures in your API, you can confidently update your endpoints to provide the best user experience possible!