Скачать или смотреть Chasing Yield Without Losing Reality

Check out our Website!
https://singularagronomics.com

Check out our full product line here!
https://singularagronomics.com/products/

Are you interested in any of our line of products, or want to learn more? Follow the link below to find a dealer closest to you!
https://singularagronomics.com/contact/

Check out our Quarterly Newsletter:
https://singularagronomics.com/newsle...

Blog:
https://singularagronomics.com/blog/

Want to become a Distributor?
Email Us: [email protected]

Check us out on Social Media!
Instagram:   / singular_agronomics  
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?...

Protect Our Farms: Chasing Yield Without Losing Reality 🌽💡

Every farmer loves to run trials. Strip-till vs. no-till. Foliar with vs. without fulvic. KTS timing. It’s how we learn. But the danger is letting trials turn into moonshots instead of realistic, repeatable wins.

Strip-Till Reality Check

This season, we ran 24 rows of straight no-till side-by-side with strip-till, shutting the pump off to prove it wasn’t “extra fertility.” What showed up was tassel delay and uneven height—reminders that tillage itself can be a factor, not just fertility placement.

The big question is: when pollination gets pushed into drought and heat, what’s the yield penalty? That’s the kind of reality trialing forces you to face.

Carbon, Roots, and Rotation

One thing we’ve learned is how powerful carbon is in setting up the next crop. In ridge-till country, throwing wheat stubble into ridges creates a root highway for the corn crop that follows. Pull the straw back and you’ll see corn roots climbing into that residue. Every time we’ve grown seed corn after this wheat–bean system, it’s been a win. That’s not just fertility—it’s biology, structure, and carbon all working together.

Sulfur and the KTS Edge

KTS has quickly moved from “trial” to “no-brainer” on our farm. In side-by-sides, we’ve seen 10–12 bushel gains on beans—especially when paired with fulvic acid. What’s fascinating is that leaf tissue samples actually showed less K and N in the fulvic strips. At first glance, you’d think it failed—until harvest. The nutrients weren’t stuck in the leaf, they were translocated into pods.

That raised a bigger question: how many nutrients do we already have locked in the plant that just need help moving? Fulvic didn’t “add” fertility—it helped unlock it.

Asking “Then What?”

A lot of us stop at the tissue test. If it shows high N or high Mg, we check the box and call it good. But the better question is, then what?

If N is high in the leaf, did it actually make it into amino acids and proteins?

If Mg is always high in your soils, is it really available—or just “there”?

If your K is in the plant, is it getting to the pods?

The challenge is not just looking at numbers, but asking what they mean for yield.

The Takeaway

Protecting your farm means balancing curiosity with practicality. Keep trialing—but leave checks. Push products like KTS or fulvic when they prove out. And above all, don’t stop at the first “good” number. Ask the next question: then what?

That’s where real yield—and long-term legacy—gets built.