Скачать или смотреть Efficiently Managing Case Statements in Verilog for State Machines

Learn how to handle multiple matching cases in Verilog state machines, reducing code repetition and improving clarity.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/67298095/ asked by the user 'quentin' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13774396/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/67303334/ provided by the user 'dave_59' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2755607/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Multiple items matching in Verilog case statement

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Efficiently Managing Case Statements in Verilog for State Machines

When working with state machines in Verilog, especially those with numerous similar states, it's not uncommon to encounter a situation that leads to long-winded, repetitive code. This can introduce confusion and increase the risk of errors if modifications are necessary down the line. In this post, we’ll explore a solution to streamline your case statement, enhancing the clarity and maintainability of your code.

The Problem: Repetitive States in a State Machine

Consider a state machine that operates in a sequence of states like S_INIT, S_WAIT_1, S_WAIT_2, ..., up to S_FINISH. Below is an excerpt from a typical Verilog code structure for such a state machine:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This code block, while functional, showcases repetition across states 1 to 126, where each condition follows a similar structure. This repetition not only clutters the code but also makes it difficult to manage.

The Solution: Streamlining the Case Statement

Option 1: Using an If/Else Chain

One effective way to minimize redundancy is by using an if/else chain instead of a case statement. This allows for more concise expressions for state transitions, particularly for a contiguous range of states. Here’s how you can structure it:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Option 2: Simplifying with a Case

If you still prefer the clarity of a case statement, you can modify the structure like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

By restructuring the state transition logic in your Verilog code, we not only reduce redundancy but also enhance the clarity and readability of the state machine design. Whether you choose an if/else chain or a streamlined case statement, the main goal is to maintain the effectiveness of your state machine while keeping your codebase manageable. This approach will surely pay off in the long run as your designs grow in complexity.

Happy coding! If you have any questions, feel free to drop them in the comments below.