Donor surveys that work: Socratic fundrasing in bulk (The Socratic Fundraiser 12)

Описание к видео Donor surveys that work: Socratic fundrasing in bulk (The Socratic Fundraiser 12)

From "The Socratic Fundraiser: Using Questions to Advance the Donor’s Story" http://www.encouragegenerosity.com/Th...
REFERENCES
Armitage, C. J., et al. (2015). Expectations are more predictive of behavior than behavioral intentions: Evidence from two prospective studies. Annals of Behav. Med., 49(2), 239-246, 240.
Bodur, H. O., et al. (2015). Will you purchase environmentally friendly products? Using prediction requests to increase choice of sustainable products. J. of Bus. Ethics, 129(1), 59-75.
Burkhart, et al. (In Press). Associations of mail survey length and layout with response rates. Med. Care Research and Rev., https://J.s.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1...
Descheemaeker, M., et al. (2017). On the generalization of attitude accessibility after repeated attitude expression. European J. of Soc. Psych., 47, 97-104.
Downing, J. W., et al. (1992). Effects of repeated expressions on attitude extremity. J. of Pers. & Soc. Psych., 63(1), 17-29.
Godin, G., et al. (2014). Promoting the return of lapsed blood donors: A seven-arm randomized controlled trial of the question–behavior effect. Health Psych., 33(7), 646-655
Godin, G., et al. (2008). Asking questions changes behavior: Mere measurement effects on frequency of blood donation. Health Psych., 27(2), 179-184.
Greenwald, A. G., et al. (1987). Increasing voting behavior by asking people if they expect to vote. J. of Applied Psych., 72(2), 315-318.
Gueguen, N., & Lamy, L. (2011). The effect of the word “love” on compliance to a request for humanitarian aid: An evaluation in a field setting. Social Influence, 6(4), 249-258.
Holland, R. W., et al. (2003). From repetition to conviction: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of attitude certainty. J. of Exp. Soc. Psych., 39(6), 594-601.
James, R. N., III. (2016). Phrasing the charitable bequest inquiry. VOLUNTAS: Int'l J. of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(2), 998-1011.
James, R. N., III. (2016, March 7). Using biasing questions in charitable bequest surveys. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2744006
James, R. N., III. (2018). Creating understanding and interest in charitable financial and estate planning: An experimental test of introductory phrases. J. of Personal Finance, 17(2), 9-21.
James, R. N., III. (2018). Describing complex charitable giving instruments: Experimental tests of technical finance terms and tax benefits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 28(4), 437-452.
James, R. N., III. (2018). Increasing charitable donation intentions with preliminary importance ratings. Int'l Review of Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 15(3), 393-411.
James, R. N., III. (2019). Encouraging repeated memorial donations to a scholarship fund: An experimental test of permanence goals and anniversary acknowledgements. Philanthropy & Education, 2(2), 1-28.
James, R. N., III. (2020). The emerging potential of longitudinal empirical research in estate planning: Examples from charitable bequests. UC Davis Law Review, 53, 2397-2431
James, R. N., III., & O’Boyle, M. W. (2014). Charitable estate planning as visualized autobiography: An fMRI study of its neural correlates. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Q., 43(2), 355-373.
James, R. N., III., & Routley, C. (2016). We the living: the effects of living and deceased donor stories on charitable bequest giving intentions. International J. of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 21(2), 109-117.
Kessler, J. B., Milkman, K. L., & Zhang, C. Y. (2019). Getting the rich and powerful to give. Management Science, 65(9), 4049-4062.
Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving: The time-ask effect. J. of Consumer Research, 35(3), 543-557.
Nilsson, A., Erlandsson, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2016). The congruency between moral foundations and intentions to donate, self- reported donations, and actual donations to charity. J. of Research in Personality, 65, 22–29.
Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. (2000). Improving telephone fundraising by use of self-prophecy. Int'l J. of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 5(4), 365-372.
Rolstad, S., Adler, J., & Rydén, A. (2011). Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value in Health, 14(8), 1101-1108.
Sherman, S. J. (1980). On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. J. of Pers. & Soc. Psych, 39(2), 211-221
Shih, T.-H., & Xitao, F. (2008). Comparing response rates from web and mail surveys: A meta-analysis. Field Methods, 20, 249-271.
Spangenberg, E. R., et al. (2003). Mass-communicated prediction requests: Practical application and a cognitive dissonance explanation for self-prophecy. J. of Marketing, 67(3), 47-62.
Sprott, D. E., et al. (1999). Two more self-prophecy experiments. In NA - Advances in Consumer Research: Vol. 26 (pp. 621-626). Assn for Consumer Research.
Zaval, L., et al. (2015). How will I be remembered? Conserving the environment for the sake of one’s legacy. Psych Science, 26(2), 231-236.

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке