Скачать или смотреть Efficiently Concatenate Multiple Tables in Impala Using Wildcard Patterns

Learn how to effectively use Impala SQL to concatenate multiple tables with a consistent naming convention in Hadoop, avoiding common pitfalls and exploring efficient strategies.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62592714/ asked by the user 'spcial' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2492068/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62614158/ provided by the user 'Rishu S' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1131789/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Using Impala to select multiple tables with wildcard pattern and concatenate them

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Efficiently Concatenate Multiple Tables in Impala Using Wildcard Patterns

If you are diving into the world of Impala SQL and Hadoop, you might find yourself needing to query a significant number of tables at once, especially when these tables share a similar naming convention and schema. For instance, you may have tables such as process_1, process_2, process_3, and so forth. The question arises: how can you efficiently select all these tables and concatenate them into a single large dataset or dataframe?

In this guide, we will explore your options for achieving this using Impala SQL, as well as the pros and cons of each method.

The Challenge of Concatenating Tables

Given a situation where:

You have hundreds of tables with identical schemas.

These tables follow a consistent naming pattern (like process_*).

You might wonder if you can use a wildcard pattern in SQL to query them directly. For example, a query like:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

is often a desired solution; however, that approach does not work in Impala.

Solution Approaches

1. Use a View with Union All

One possible method is to create a view that unites all the tables. An example of how this can be implemented is shown below:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

While this approach does provide a straightforward way to view data from multiple tables, it does come with significant drawbacks:

Disadvantages:

Memory Utilization: Using UNION can be resource-intensive. It's manageable for a small number of tables (about 2-5) but can lead to performance issues with a larger number.

Manual Updates Required: If new tables are added in the future, you must manually alter the view to include these. This can turn into a maintenance hassle.

Schema Compatibility: This method assumes all tables have the same schema. If they don’t, you'll run into issues.

2. Programmatic Table Retrieval and File Creation

The second approach is to programmatically iterate through the list of tables and create a file from all of them. Here's how you can do it:

Fetch the List of Tables: Use the SHOW TABLES LIKE 'process*' command in Impala to get all relevant tables.

Write a Loop in Python: Using Python, iterate over the list of tables and run a query for each one.

Concatenate Data: Combine the results into a single dataframe or file.

Upload to HDFS: Once completed, set the resulting file on Hadoop’s HDFS and create a table on top of it.

Considerations for This Approach:

Database Requests: Keep in mind that this involves making multiple requests to the Impala database, which could be problematic in a multi-tenant environment where resources are shared.

Conclusion

While creating a view to unite your tables is a feasible approach, it has its limitations, particularly with scalability and maintenance. The second approach, utilizing a programmatic solution to loop through table names and concatenate their data, is a more efficient method for handling a vast number of tables in Impala.

By following these strategies, you can effectively manage and query your data across numerous tables without the headache of constant updates or performance hitches.

It's always crucial to evaluate the pros and cons of each method based on your specific requirements. Happy querying!