Explore effective strategies for reusing `std::unordered_map` to boost performance in your C+  +   programs. Learn about memory management, dynamic allocations, and alternative structures.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68437598/ asked by the user 'Alex Cohn' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/192373/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68441520/ provided by the user 'Tony Delroy' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/410767/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: reusing std::unordered_map efficiently
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Enhancing Performance: Reusing std::unordered_map Efficiently in C+  +  
In modern programming, especially in C+  +  , performance optimization is a continuous pursuit. A common scenario faced by developers is when managing dynamic data structures like dictionaries or maps. Given the transient nature of such data in many applications, the question often arises: Is it more efficient to reuse std::unordered_map with clear() method rather than deleting and recreating them? In this guide, we will break down the intricacies of this approach and explore potential alternatives for better efficiency in your programs.
Understanding Memory Management in std::unordered_map
Before jumping into the effectiveness of reusing std::unordered_map, let's understand what happens under the hood. When using std::unordered_map<std::string, int>, a few critical memory allocations occur:
Bucket Allocation: An array of buckets is allocated, which hold iterators pointing to nodes in a singly linked list. Typically, the number of buckets is between 1x to 2x the peak number of elements.
Node Allocation: Every element stored requires additional memory for a node that contains:
A pointer to the next node
A hash value
The std::string key and int value
Long std::string Handling: For strings longer than 15 characters, the standard library utilizes a Short String Optimization, storing these strings in a dynamically allocated buffer.
The Impact of clear() Method
When using the clear() method on your unordered_map, here's what happens:
The following two categories of allocations are deallocated:
Node allocations for the keys and values
The extra allocations for the strings longer than 15 characters are also cleaned up.
However, it's important to note that the bucket allocation itself remains intact until the container is destructed, leading to just one extra deallocation in that case.
Given this behavior, you may find that reusing unordered_map instances does not yield a significant performance boost. Instead, you often simply minimize the overhead tied to managing memory.
Exploring Alternative Data Structures
If performance is paramount in your application, you may want to consider a few alternatives to improve efficiency significantly.
1. Set an Upper Bound on String Length
If your application can restrict the length of the strings used, you could optimize your data structures further. By ensuring that string lengths do not exceed a certain limit (e.g., 8 or 16 bytes), you set the stage for more memory-efficient data structures.
2. Use Open Addressing
With constraints on string length, consider switching to a hash table that employs open addressing (also known as closed hashing). In this approach:
Both keys and values, i.e., the std::string and int, are stored directly in the buckets.
This drastically reduces the number of dynamic allocations to just one for the entire structure.
Conclusion: Measuring Performance Matters
In summary, reusing std::unordered_map with the clear() method doesn't yield noticeable performance gains compared to simply deleting and recreating them. If performance is crucial, you may want to analyze your data closely and explore alternatives like open addressing. Always remember: performance can vary significantly with different approaches, so it is vital to measure the outcomes of your implementation to ensure the best performance for your specific application.
By refining your choice of data structures and managing memory wisely, you can achieve a more efficient C+  +   program that meets the demands of modern applications.
                         
                    
Информация по комментариям в разработке