Скачать или смотреть How to Create a Generic Try-Catch to Avoid Repeated Code in C#

Discover how to create a generic `try-catch` method in C# that minimizes redundancy and improves code efficiency.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62261439/ asked by the user 'MilkTea027' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1820869/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62261589/ provided by the user 'Guru Stron' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2501279/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to create a generic try catch repeated code?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Eliminating Redundancy: Creating a Generic Try-Catch in C#

If you're a developer working with C# , chances are you've encountered repetitive code patterns, especially when it involves error handling. Specifically, the traditional try-catch blocks can become cumbersome, leading to bloated and less readable code.

In this guide, we'll explore how to create a generic try-catch mechanism that minimizes redundancy and simplifies your error handling. This solution will significantly clean up your code while maintaining its functionality.

The Problem

Consider the following code snippet:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example, the method SomeMethod is the only part that changes, while the error handling aspect remains static across your applications. If you find yourself writing multiple try-catch blocks like this, it's time to consider a more efficient approach.

The Solution

To streamline your error handling, we can create a method that accepts a function delegate (Func) as a parameter. This allows us to execute any method we want within our generalized try-catch block.

Here's how we can implement this:

Step 1: Define Your Base Classes

Start by defining your base request class and any derived request classes that you'll use throughout your application:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 2: Create the Generalized Method

Next, we need to write a method that handles the exception and returns the desired response type, in this case, Request:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 3: Implement Your Method

Now that we have a generalized exception handling method, we can implement any method with it. For example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 4: Usage

Finally, to use the HandleException method, you simply pass in the method you want to execute:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

By creating a generic try-catch block using Func, you can efficiently handle exceptions throughout your application without writing repetitive code. This approach not only enhances the readability of your code but also ensures that all your methods follow a consistent pattern in error handling.

Now, instead of writing multiple try-catch blocks, you can handle exceptions in a cleaner, more efficient manner, making your development process smoother and your codebase more maintainable.

By adopting this method, you can focus on writing the functionality that matters most without bogging down your code with repetitive error handling patterns.