Скачать или смотреть Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Herbert (2017) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary

The legal case questions whether Utah's "ag-gag" law, which prohibits deceptive entry and filming in agricultural operations, is constitutional. Animal rights groups sued Utah, arguing that the law violates their First Amendment rights and Equal Protection Clause. The court must determine whether the law restricts protectable speech and what level of scrutiny to use. The plaintiffs argue that some lies criminalized by the law enjoy First Amendment protection, and the law criminalizes harmless lies. The court must also consider whether misrepresentations by an invited guest make them a trespasser and if misrepresentations criminalized by the law are subject to First Amendment scrutiny.

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Herbert (2017)
United States District Court for the District of Utah
263 F. Supp. 3d 1193

Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/anima...

---

Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.

Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs

Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.

Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_c...