Скачать или смотреть Donald Trump Fighting The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Of 1988 / Trump Being Unbelievably Racist.

1. Trump's Casino Ventures:
Donald Trump had been involved in the casino business for many years, owning and operating several high-profile casinos, including Trump Taj Mahal, Trump Plaza, and Trump Castle in Atlantic City. His ventures in the casino industry were part of his broader real estate empire.

2. Indian Gaming Act:
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) of 1988 was a federal law that established the framework for gaming on Native American reservations. It allowed tribes to operate casinos on their lands, provided they had a compact with their state government. The law was designed to create a revenue source for tribes and promote economic development on reservations.

Trump's Advocacy
**1. Expansion of Casino Industry:
In the early 1990s, Trump was vocal about expanding his casino business and saw an opportunity in the growing Native American gaming industry. He believed that tribes operating casinos could potentially compete with his businesses and impact his profits.

**2. Conflict of Interests:
Trump’s desire to compete with Native American casinos led him to advocate for changes in the legal framework governing tribal gaming. He argued that Native American tribes should not have exclusive rights to operate casinos on their lands if such operations were to be regulated similarly to other businesses.

**3. Public Statements:
Trump made several public statements expressing his views on Native American casinos. He was known for his criticism of tribal gaming operations, suggesting that they had an unfair advantage because of their special legal status. He argued that their casinos operated under different rules and regulations compared to other commercial casinos, which he believed created an uneven playing field.

**4. Legal and Political Actions:
Trump’s criticism was part of a broader push from the gaming industry to challenge the exclusivity and regulation of tribal casinos. His stance was one of many voices in a larger debate about the scope and fairness of the Indian Gaming Act and its impact on the casino market.

**5. Tribal Response:
Native American leaders and advocates argued that Trump’s position was not just about competition but also reflected a lack of understanding and respect for the sovereignty of tribal nations and their right to self-determination. They stressed that tribal casinos provided essential economic benefits and employment opportunities for their communities.

Legacy and Impact
**1. Ongoing Debate:
The debate over tribal gaming rights continues to be a contentious issue, balancing economic interests, legal frameworks, and the sovereignty of Native American tribes.

**2. Trump’s Business Interests:
Trump's interest in the regulation of casino gaming was also part of his broader business strategy to maintain and expand his empire, reflecting the complex interactions between business, law, and politics.

Trump's advocacy and public statements about Native American casinos were part of a larger conversation about gaming regulations and economic competition, highlighting his broader approach to business and legal challenges.