Скачать или смотреть Avoiding C+ + -to-Python Aliasing with SWIG

Learn how to prevent unwanted aliasing when interfacing C+ + classes with Python using SWIG. This guide will walk you through the solution step-by-step.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63260754/ asked by the user 'Lluís Alemany-Puig' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12075306/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63277970/ provided by the user 'Lluís Alemany-Puig' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12075306/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: SWIG: avoid C+ + -to-Python aliasing

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Avoiding C+ + -to-Python Aliasing with SWIG

When developing a library in C+ + that interfaces with Python using SWIG, you may encounter an issue known as aliasing. This occurs when two variables refer to the same object in memory, and a modification to one affects the other unexpectedly. In this guide, we'll discuss how to avoid this problem in your Python code by implementing a cloning technique in your C+ + classes.

Understanding the Problem: The Aliasing Dilemma

Consider the C+ + class named dummy that has a single private attribute called attr, which is initialized to 0. The following Python script demonstrates the aliasing issue:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example, when we modified d1 by calling set_attr(12), the change also appeared in d2 due to aliasing. When d2 was assigned to d1, it essentially became a reference to the same object. The expectation here is that d2 should not reflect the modifications made to d1, but due to how SWIG interfaces the classes, it does.

Compiler Warnings

The following warnings are generated during compilation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

These warnings indicate that SWIG's treatment of overloaded methods is leading to unexpected aliasing behavior.

Dissecting the Implementation

To remedy the aliasing issue, you can introduce a clone method in your C+ + class, which will allow for a true copy of the object instead of just a reference.

Step 1: Modify Your Header File

Add a clone method in the dummy.hpp file. The modified header should look like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Next, implement the clone method in your dummy.cpp:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 2: Extend Your SWIG Interface File

Now, update your dummy_wrap.i interface file by appending the following code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 3: Update Python Code

Finally, update your Python script to use the new clone method:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

By following the steps outlined above, you can effectively manage the aliasing problem when interfacing C+ + classes with Python. The use of a clone method allows your Python code to work with independent instances of your C+ + objects, thus avoiding unexpected behavior due to shared references. As a result, modifications to one object will not reflect in another, providing the behavior you expect.

Implementing these changes will not only resolve aliasing issues but also enhance the usability of your library in Python. If you have any questions or comments about this implementation, feel free to reach out!