Скачать или смотреть Why did Johnny Depp lose in the UK but win in the US

Why did Johnny Depp lose in the UK but win in the US?

Welcome to Celeb Spotlights!

At the start of his recent trial, many legal experts suggested that Mr. Depp had a weaker chance of winning than he did in the UK because the US has very strong free speech protections. The fact that the jury found that Ms. Heard was guilty of defamation with an article in which she claimed she was a victim of domestic abuse means they didn't believe her testimony. Mark Stephens, an international media lawyer, told the BBC that it's "very rare" that essentially the same case is tried on two sides of the pond and gets different results. The UK suit was launched after Depp had already started the action in Virginia, meaning the cases were developing separately. But the loss from the UK action may have influenced how Depp's legal team approached the trial portion in the US, which came more than a year later. In the UK ruling, Nichol noted that Depp's lawyers said it was unfair that their real opponent was not The Sun but Heard, who wasn't a defendant. By contrast, the US trial was focused heavily on Heard and her credibility, a strategy that seemed to prevail. In this video, we are looking into Why did Johnny Depp lose in the UK but won in the US

Subscribe to our Celeb Spotlights channel
👉 https://celebspotlights.convertri.com... and Hit the Bell Notification 🔔 to see more of our content!

#johnnydeppamberheard #celebspotlights #johnnydepp

Do you have any questions or other stuff you want to know about? Feel free to let us know below!

Also, if this video is helpful to you, don't hesitate to leave a like 👍 , and hit that subscribe button for more high-quality content!


--------------------------------------------------------

COPYRIGHT NOTICE: The Copyright Laws of the United States recognize a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.” This video and our YouTube channel, in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.

Fair Dealing:
Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988 (UK) section 30 states “Fair dealing” with a work for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another work, does not infringe any copyright in the work provided that it is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. Copyright in a work is not infringed by the use of a quotation from the work (whether for criticism or review or otherwise).