Скачать или смотреть Understanding Why map Returns an Iterator in Python 3

Learn why using `map` behaves differently in Python 3 compared to Python 2, and how to properly implement it in your code
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/70455464/ asked by the user 'mrc' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5556466/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/70455968/ provided by the user 'mamo' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12738660/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Don't understand why Map returns iterator makes code to fail

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Why map Returns an Iterator in Python 3

If you’ve recently transitioned from Python 2 to Python 3, you may have encountered some puzzling behavior with the map function. Many developers find themselves frustrated when code that once worked seamlessly in Python 2 starts throwing errors or behaves unexpectedly in Python 3. One common issue arises from the fact that in Python 3, map returns an iterator instead of a list. Let’s break down this problem and explore its solution.

The Problem: Understanding the Behavior of map

Here’s a snippet of code that captures the issue:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

What Happened?

In Python 2, the map function would return a list of results. So, executing the above code would immediately call the __delete_table_id_range for each increment value in the specified range, yielding the expected behavior.

In Python 3, map returns an iterator. This means that the function isn’t called until you actually iterate over the results. Consequently, if you don’t iterate through the results explicitly, the function will not run at all, leading to confusion — it's as if nothing happens.

The Solution: Correcting the Code

To solve this problem, you need to ensure that the __delete_table_id_range function executes as intended. There are a few methods to accomplish this. We'll explore both approaches in detail.

Use list to Force Execution of map

You can explicitly convert the result of map to a list. This will force all the function calls to execute, as shown below:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Alternative: Use a Classic for Loop

While using list() is one way to force execution, a more straightforward and often clearer method is to use a classic for loop. This explicitly iterates through each increment value without relying on map:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Why Choose One Method Over the Other?

Performance: Using map with list() might seem convenient, but it constructs a full list in memory. If you're working with large datasets, that may lead to performance issues. A for loop processes elements one by one, which can be more efficient.

Readability: The for loop is often clearer in intent. It directly conveys that you're iterating through a range of values and performing an action for each.

Conclusion

Understanding the differences in behavior between Python 2 and Python 3 is crucial for writing effective code. By recognizing that map returns an iterator in Python 3 and choosing the appropriate method—whether it be using list() or a simple for loop—you can avoid confusion and ensure your functions are executed as expected.

If you’ve experienced this issue, you’re not alone! By following the suggestions outlined above, your code will run smoothly in Python 3. Happy coding!