Скачать или смотреть Solving the Back-off Restarting Failed Container Error with ECR Images in Kubernetes Deployments

Learn how to troubleshoot and resolve the `Back-off restarting failed container` error when using Amazon ECR images in Kubernetes. This guide provides step-by-step solutions to ensure smooth deployments.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/75406776/ asked by the user 'Tristan' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/10332582/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/75409270/ provided by the user 'Tristan' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/10332582/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Error with only ECR image Back-off restarting failed container

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Troubleshooting the Back-off Restarting Failed Container Error in Kubernetes ECR Deployments

If you're new to Kubernetes and Amazon EKS, encountering errors can be daunting. One common issue that many users face is the Back-off restarting failed container error when deploying images from Amazon ECR (Elastic Container Registry). In this post, we’ll dive into understanding this problem, examining the provided deployment file, and discussing effective solutions.

Understanding the Problem

We have a simple NGINX deployment created on Amazon EKS using a custom image from ECR. The deployment file seems straightforward, but there is a roadblock when pulling and running the ECR image. The error message from Kubernetes indicates a problem when trying to start the container. Here's a snippet from the pod's event output:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Upon checking the pod's logs, we see:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This error suggests that there’s a mismatch between the image architecture and the node's architecture in the EKS cluster.

Breakdown of the Error

The exec format error typically indicates one of two issues:

Architecture Mismatch: The base image used in your Dockerfile (in this case, keymetrics/pm2:18-alpine) only supports a specific architecture (like amd64), but your EKS worker nodes are likely running on a different architecture, such as arm64.

Entry Point Issues: An incorrectly specified entry point or executable file in your Docker image can also lead to this error, but the architecture issue is more common in cloud setups.

Investigating Architectures

To understand the architectures at play:

EKS Node Environment: You can check the architecture of your EKS worker nodes through the AWS Management Console or using AWS CLI commands.

Docker Image Architecture: Pull the ECR image locally and check which architectures it supports using the command:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Solutions to the Problem

Now that we understand the root causes of the issue, here are two effective solutions to resolve it:

1. Create an EKS Cluster with amd64 Worker Nodes

If possible, you can recreate your EKS cluster and configure it to use amd64 worker nodes. This allows the images built for amd64 architecture to run without compatibility issues.

Steps:

Navigate to the EKS console.

Launch a new cluster with the correct configurations.

Ensure the worker nodes are set to amd64.

2. Use a Base Image Compatible with Both Architectures

Another more flexible option is to use a different base image that supports both arm64 and amd64. For example, replacing keymetrics/pm2:18-alpine with node:18.14-alpine, which has better multi-architecture support.

Here’s an updated Dockerfile example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Using a multi-architecture base image can save time and effort in the long run, especially when working across different environments or cloud providers.

Conclusion

Encountering deployment issues in Kubernetes can be frustrating, especially for newcomers. However, understanding the nature of the error and taking the right steps can greatly ease the process. Whether by recreating your EKS cluster with the correct architecture or switching to a more compatible base image, you can effectively resolve the Back-off restarting failed container error and get your applications running smoothly.

By following the solutions outlined above, you’ll be better equipped to handle similar issues in your Kubernetes journey. Best of luck with your Kubernetes deployments!