Скачать или смотреть [Full Video] Hindi vs English in Court | Patna High Court Heated Debate | Hindi Diwas | हिंदी दिवस

In this Patna High Court hearing, Justice P. B. Bajanthri, an English-speaking judge, engaged in a powerful exchange with a Hindi-speaking lawyer who argued passionately for the use of Hindi in court. The courtroom debate highlights constitutional provisions under Article 343, Article 348, Article 350 & Article 351 of the Indian Constitution, dealing with the official language, translation of documents, and rights of litigants to use Hindi.

This courtroom clash between English Judge Justice Bajanthri and the Hindi Lawyer is a must-watch for law students (LLB/LLM), UPSC aspirants, judiciary candidates, and anyone interested in Hindi Diwas celebrations.

📌 Topics Covered:
Hindi vs English in Indian Judiciary
Role of Translation Department in Courts
Constitutional provisions on language (Art. 343–351)
Patna High Court Hindi debate
Justice P. B. Bajanthri’s remarks

👉 Do you think Hindi should be made the primary language in High Courts and Supreme Court? Share your views in the comments!

#PatnaHighCourt #HindiDiwas #JusticeBajanthri

Patna High Court, Justice P B Bajanthri, Hindi vs English in court, Hindi lawyer Patna High Court, Hindi Diwas special, Courtroom drama India, Indian Constitution Article 343, Article 348, Article 350, Article 351, Hindi in Indian judiciary, Patna High Court case in Hindi, Justice Bajanthri Patna, Hindi language in courts, Official language of India, Law students Hindi vs English, Supreme Court Hindi debate, LLB Hindi Diwas, Hindi in judiciary, Indian court language debate

#PatnaHighCourt #JusticePBBajanthri #HindiVsEnglish #HindiLawyer #HindiDiwas #IndianJudiciary #CourtroomDrama #Article343 #Article348 #Article350 #Article351 #LawStudents #SupremeCourt #LLB #HindiInCourt

On this Hindi Diwas, this case sparks a bigger debate — क्या न्यायपालिका में हिंदी को उसका हक़ मिलना चाहिए? Watch how lawyers argued passionately in Hindi while the judge insisted on English translations.

This powerful courtroom exchange raises questions on our Constitution (Article 343-351), language rights, and the future of Hindi in Indian courts. Don’t miss this real legal drama!

👉 Share your opinion in the comments: Should Hindi be accepted as the sole language in High Courts?

English Judge vs Hindi Lawyer” – A rare and powerful courtroom moment inside the Patna High Court! 🏛️🔥
The debate is simple yet historic – should petitions in Hindi be accepted without English translation? On this Hindi Diwas, let’s rethink: क्या हमारी न्याय व्यवस्था में हिंदी को उसका असली स्थान मिल रहा है?

Watch the full arguments, understand the clash, and share your thoughts on whether Hindi should be fully recognized in our courts.

💬 Question for You!
Do you think petitions in the Patna High Court (or any Indian High Court) should be allowed only in English, or should Hindi (without mandatory translation) be fully accepted?

⚖️ Remember: In the Swarn Singh Bagga case, the Court said filing in Hindi is not prohibited. But translation is often demanded.

👉 Drop your thoughts in the comments– Should litigants bear the cost of English translations, or should the court’s Translation Department handle it?

🔎 Core Issue:

A petitioner filed a case in Hindi language in the Patna High Court.

The Registry/Court insisted that the petitioner must also provide an English translation of the petition.

The petitioner’s lawyer is arguing that this requirement is unfair because:

The Patna High Court has a Translation Department, which is funded and mandated to do translations.

Forcing poor or ordinary litigants to bear translation costs makes Hindi petitions impractical.

According to previous Full Bench and Division Bench decisions (like the Swaran Singh Bagga case), filing petitions in Hindi is allowed.

Under the Constitution (Articles 343–351), Hindi is to be promoted, and citizens should not be discouraged from using it in court.

⚖️ Judge’s Stand:

The Judge acknowledges that under Article 348 of the Constitution, High Court proceedings are normally in English.

However, Hindi filings are not barred—they can be accepted if translations are also available.

The dispute is whether the responsibility of translation should lie with the petitioner or the court’s translation department.

📌 References in the Transcript:

Article 348 – Specifies English as the language of High Courts and the Supreme Court, unless otherwise provided.

Articles 343–351 – Direct the promotion of Hindi as the official language.

Swaran Singh Bagga Case – Recognized that Hindi petitions can be filed in the Patna High Court.

Vinay Kumar Singh Case – Held that while Hindi can be used, translations into English are sometimes needed for smooth functioning.

✅ What’s Going On:

The petitioner wants the Court to withdraw its earlier order requiring him to provide the English translation at his own cost.

Instead, he requests that the Court’s Translation Department handle the translation, so that Hindi-speaking litigants are not burdened.