Скачать или смотреть Measuring Execution Time in C+ + OpenMP: How to Get Accurate Results

Learn how to measure the execution time of your C+ + OpenMP code accurately using `omp_get_wtime`. Discover the problems with traditional timing methods and their reliable solutions!
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/10874214/ asked by the user 'Benny' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1089239/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63621357/ provided by the user 'Hemanth Kollipara' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/11534375/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Measure execution time in C+ + OpenMP code

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 3.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Timing in C+ + OpenMP Code

As parallel computing continues to evolve, developers often face challenges in measuring execution time accurately—particularly when using OpenMP in C+ + . If you're running your code sequentially, you might find that the timing results make perfect sense. However, introducing OpenMP statements can lead to discrepancies that can confuse even experienced developers. In this guide, we'll explore this common issue and provide a simple solution to accurately measure execution time in C+ + OpenMP applications.

The Problem: Inaccurate Timing with OpenMP

When you run your C+ + code in sequential mode, the execution time can be accurately captured using the clock() function. For example, you might see something like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This method will yield results that you would expect. However, once you implement OpenMP directives, the results can lead to confusion. You may observe a decrease in execution time, but it might still reflect a much longer duration than what you actually experienced—like displaying 8-9 seconds when the real time was only 3-4 seconds.

What's Going Wrong?

The issue arises because the clock() function measures processor time for the entire process, which can inadvertently account for all threads when run in parallel mode. Thus, when you insert OpenMP directives, the total time recorded might be misleading as it could sum up the time from multiple threads rather than reflecting real elapsed time.

The Solution: Using omp_get_wtime()

To accurately capture execution time in your OpenMP programs, you should employ the omp_get_wtime() function provided by the OpenMP library. This method is designed to get the wall clock time, providing a clearer representation of actual elapsed time. Here's a simple example illustrating how to use it effectively:

Example Code

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Breaking Down the Code

Include Required Headers: Make sure you include both <stdio.h> and <omp.h>.

Start the Timer: Before your parallel code executes, call omp_get_wtime() to mark the start time.

Run Your OpenMP parallel Code: Use the # pragma omp parallel for directive to parallelize your loops.

Capture the End Time: After the parallel execution, again call omp_get_wtime() to get the completion time.

Calculate Execution Time: Subtract the start time from the finish time, and you’ll have the total elapsed time in seconds.

Display the Results: Use printf to output the results to the console, clearly showing the time taken for the parallelized operation.

Conclusion

Accurately measuring execution time in parallel programs is vital for optimization and performance analysis. While methods like clock() may suffice for sequential code, they become problematic in a parallel context. By using omp_get_wtime(), you ensure that your timing reflects the real-world duration of execution, giving you the data you need to make informed improvements.

Happy coding, and may your parallel programs run seamlessly!