Скачать или смотреть When Should System.Threading.Channels Be Preferred to ConcurrentQueue?

Discover the ideal scenarios for using `System.Threading.Channels` over `ConcurrentQueue` in producer-consumer systems, along with performance benchmarks and insights.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/76809859/ asked by the user 'CryShana' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2073282/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/76814527/ provided by the user 'CryShana' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2073282/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: When should System.Threading.Channels be preferred to ConcurrentQueue?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
When Should System.Threading.Channels Be Preferred to ConcurrentQueue?

In the world of concurrent programming in C# , developers often need to choose between various data structures to handle the challenges of producer-consumer systems efficiently. Two popular options are ConcurrentQueue<T> and System.Threading.Channels<T>. But when should you favor one over the other? Let's dive into a real-world comparison based on performance benchmarks and gain a deeper understanding of these two structures.

The Problem

Recently, a benchmark comparison was conducted between ConcurrentQueue<T> and System.Threading.Channels<T>. The aim was to evaluate their performance while processing a considerable volume of items. The initial findings indicated that ConcurrentQueue<T> performed significantly faster, leading to a question: When should channels be preferred?

Benchmark Summary:

ConcurrentQueue results: Significantly faster

Channel results: Not as efficient on a one-to-one enqueue operation

The challenge was to uncover whether the observed performance differences stemmed from implementation flaws or if these results were indicative of the intrinsic advantages and disadvantages of each structure.

Understanding the Benchmark

Setup

The comparison involved writing 1000 items 1000 times into both systems and evaluating the mean time taken to process these items. The two systems were implemented in the following way:

MyQueue:

Utilized ConcurrentQueue<T> with a consumer signaled to process items after writing.

MyChannel:

Implemented using System.Threading.Channels<T> where the consumer was designed to read items as they were produced.

Initial Results

The results of the benchmark after inserting multiple items were as follows:

MethodItemsCountMeanErrorStdDevMedianAllocatedMyQueue100019,379.4 us1,230.30 us3,569.33 us18,735.6 us8235.02 KBMyChannel100045,858.2 us1,298.42 us3,704.46 us45,689.2 us72.11 KBThe results clearly indicated that ConcurrentQueue<T> had the edge in terms of speed, which prompted further investigation into why this was the case.

Investigating the Performance Discrepancy

Key Observations

Signaling Mechanism: ConcurrentQueue<T> signaled only once for every 1000 items added, whereas Channel<T> issued a signal for every single item.

Reevaluation of Benchmark: Adjusting the benchmark to add items one at a time yielded nearly identical results for both implementations.

New benchmark results after changing the insertion logic showed:

MethodItemsCountMeanErrorStdDevMedianAllocatedMyQueue1000163.8 us22.09 us64.44 us144.8 us8.42 KBMyChannel1000163.2 us14.02 us41.12 us177.9 us5.48 KBLarge Data Sets

When moving to larger item counts:

MethodItemsCountMeanErrorStdDevMedianAllocatedMyQueue100001.668 ms0.1971 ms0.5811 ms1.841 ms16.67 KBMyChannel100001.163 ms0.1090 ms0.3197 ms1.121 ms9.92 KBConclusion: When to Use Channel<T> Over ConcurrentQueue<T>

Long-term Scalability: As item counts increased, Channel<T> began to show better performance and reduced memory allocations than ConcurrentQueue<T>. This indicates that Channels can be a more favorable choice for larger, long-running systems dealing with high throughput.

Complex Scenarios: When building applications that require more intricate patterns of message topology, flow control, or cancellation tokens, System.Threading.Channels may offer more flexibility.

Consumer Count: If a scenario involves a single reader-writer where ease of use and clarity are paramount, ConcurrentQueue<T> remains a reliable choice.

Final Note: For general prod