Скачать или смотреть The History of the Linear No Threshold Model of Radiation

In conversation with Dr. Edward Calabrese from the University of Massachusetts Amherst's School of Public Health Sciences.
https://www.umass.edu/public-health-s...

On the history of the LNT model
https://atomicinsights.com/evidence-s...

Cover up and cancer risk assessment: Prominent US scientists suppressed
evidence to promote adoption of LNT
https://ia601604.us.archive.org/22/it...

Petition to challenge the LNT model
https://www.x-lnt.org/

On the historical milestones regarding LNT
https://archive.org/download/lnt-hist...

The Muller-Neel dispute and the fate of cancer risk assessment
https://archive.org/details/muller-ne...

The Health Physics Society's Series on the history of the LNT Model.
https://hps.org/hpspublications/histo...

https://www.redjournal.org/article/S0...
The joint report of the Académie des Sciences (Paris) and of the Académie Nationale de Médecine (2005)

"With regard to the study of radiocarcinogenesis, the meta-analyses of experimental animal data have not evidenced significant cancer excess for doses below 100 mSv. They do show, however, the existence of a dose below which no excess in tumor incidence is detectable, which suggests the existence of a practical threshold. Furthermore, most of the dose–effect relationships are not linear but rather linear-quadratic or quadratic. Moreover, a hormesis is observed in approximately 40% of the experiments. Therefore, the lack of evidence of a carcinogenic effect for doses below 100 mSv in humans or animals has two possible explanations: (1) the carcinogenic effect is too small to be detected by statistical analysis; (2) there is no effect and a threshold exists."

major flaws in the LNT model
https://www.x-lnt.org/major-flaws

Data on the Atomic Bomb Survivors showing a non linear response
https://www.x-lnt.org/atomic-bomb-sur...

Nuclear Nightmares Documentary on the LNT Model
https://odysee.com/@hugokruger:5/Nucl...


An Exclusive Nuclear Street Interview with Low Dose Radiation Health Effects Expert Dr. Antone L.Brooks.
https://nuclearstreet.com/nuclear_pow...


"NS: Can you summarize in lay persons’ terms the findings of the Low Dose Program?

Brooks: The data generated by the research in the low dose region demonstrated that the biological responses seen following exposure to low doses of radiation are very different than those observed following high doses. The body can detect and respond to low doses of radiation by activating a number of genes and proteins that help protect the body against damage from that exposure and from subsequent exposures. These responses are called “adaptive responses” and are widely observed in the low dose region."