Скачать или смотреть Understanding 3D Textures in WebGL2: TexImage3D vs. TexStorage3D

Learn the difference between `texImage3D` and `texStorage3D` in WebGL2 and discover which approach is best for handling 3D textures in your projects.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63353873/ asked by the user 'Pravin Poudel' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5676603/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63354004/ provided by the user 'gman' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/128511/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to handle 3d texture on webgl2

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding 3D Textures in WebGL2: TexImage3D vs. TexStorage3D

WebGL2 enhances the capabilities of WebGL, enabling developers to create richer and more complex 3D graphics experiences directly in the browser. One of the challenges you might face while working with WebGL2 is handling 3D textures. In this post, we'll explore two important methods for working with 3D textures: texImage3D() and texStorage3D(). We'll discuss their differences, when to use each, and how they affect performance and flexibility in your applications.

The Problem: Handling 3D Textures

If you're familiar with 2D textures, transitioning to 3D textures can be a bit challenging. The methods texImage3D() and texStorage3D() are both used for texture data, but they approach texture management differently. Many developers find this confusing and often wonder which method is more efficient or suitable for their needs.

The Methods Explained

texImage3D():

Allocates memory for one mip level at a time.

More flexibility in defining your texture data.

Requires obtaining the entire mip level data before the allocation is done.

texStorage3D():

Allocates memory for all mip levels up front.

Can provide better performance since the texture memory is allocated in one go.

Less flexibility; the sizes and formats must be defined at the time of allocation and cannot be changed later.

Let’s take a closer look at how each method works and the implications of their usage.

Breaking Down the Approaches

Using texStorage3D()

When you use texStorage3D(), you specify the size and internal format of the largest mip level when allocating the texture. This approach allocates memory for all the mip levels immediately:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Memory Efficiency: Allocating all mip levels at once can be more efficient because the graphics driver can optimize memory usage effectively.

Restrictions: Note that once you use texStorage3D(), the texture size and its internal format cannot be altered. This means if you set it incorrectly, it can lead to constraints down the line.

Using texImage3D()

On the other hand, texImage3D() allocates only one mip level at a time:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Flexibility: This method allows for defining mip levels one at a time, which can be useful in certain scenarios where the sizes and formats of mip levels might change dynamically.

Performance Consideration: However, this could lead to performance issues, as the graphics driver needs to validate size and format constraints every time you attempt to use the texture. The more information it has to check at run-time, the less efficient the operation might be.

When to Use Each Method

Choose texStorage3D(): If you're sure about your texture sizes and formats upfront and need optimal performance. This is particularly effective for applications that require consistent and stable texture properties.

Choose texImage3D(): When you need the flexibility to change mip levels or dynamically load texture data. If your textures are determined at runtime, this may be the better choice.

Conclusion

Understanding the intricacies between texImage3D() and texStorage3D() is crucial for efficient texture management in WebGL2. Employing the right method based on your application's needs can significantly impact performance and resource utilization. As you continue exploring 3D textures, keep these distinctions in mind to enhance your web graphics programming capabilities!