Скачать или смотреть UDRP Case Study: The Importance of a Strong Complaint

Domain name attorney Doug Isenberg of GigaLaw explains that some domain name disputes are just not appropriate for the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), and some UDRP complaints are so poorly drafted that they're destined to fail. In this video, Doug discusses why it's so important to properly evaluate a domain name dispute up front and then, if you do proceed, why it's absolutely essential to file the strongest possible complaint without taking anything for granted.

Cases cited:

RigMinder Operating v. Evan Gooch and YachtMinder Systems, WIPO Case No. D2020-2849 (rigminder.com), https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/s...
​
​- XTM International Inc v. Zhong Hao, Forum Claim No. 1925207 (xtm.com), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/he...

​GigaLaw website: https://giga.law/
​
Domain Name Disputes: A Masterclass: https://giga.law/masterclass

About Doug Isenberg: https://giga.law/about-doug-isenberg

Video chapters:
0:00​​ - Introduction
1:17​​ - RigMinder case
3:06​​ - XTM case
3:53​ - Thorough UDRP complaints
5:39​​ - RigMinder decision: "Fails to provide..."
8:01​​ - XTM decision: "Scantiest allegations..."
9:00 - Lessons learned
9:55​​ - To learn more

Disclaimer: This video is for general informational purposes only, provides only a summary of specific issues, and is not intended to be and should not be relied upon as legal advice regarding any specific situation. This video is not intended to create, and does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Viewers should consult with legal counsel to determine how laws, policies or decisions and other topics discussed in this video apply to the viewers' specific circumstances. This video may be considered attorney advertising under court rules of certain jurisdictions. Copyright © 2021 Douglas M. Isenberg