Скачать или смотреть Choosing Between Public Setters, Friend Classes, and Specific Constructors in C++

Discover the best approach for managing class field access in C++: Evaluate `public setters`, `friend classes`, and `specific constructors` to enhance your OOP implementation.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/72849505/ asked by the user 'Samo Chreno' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/17019737/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/72849639/ provided by the user 'lorro' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6292621/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Public Setters vs. Friend Class vs. Specific Constructor

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Field Access in C++ Classes

When developing a programming language or working with object-oriented programming in C++, one of the common challenges arises from managing access to class fields. In this guide, we will explore a specific dilemma: determining the best way to manage private fields in a class derived from a parser. As your code evolves and you move towards encapsulation, it's crucial to understand the pros and cons of different approaches to accessing and manipulating class fields.

The Problem Statement

Imagine you have a Parser class that generates instances of derived classes from a Node structure. Initially, Node was simple and used a struct. However, after transitioning to a class structure with private fields, you find yourself struggling to choose between three main approaches to facilitate field access in a DerivedNode class:

Public Setters: Using public setter methods to modify private fields after instance creation.

Friend Classes: Granting the Parser class access to private members of DerivedNode by declaring it a friend.

Specific Constructors: Using constructors that directly accept and initialize fields upon object creation.

Let’s break down these options and highlight the best practices when it comes to managing field access.

Approach Breakdown

Option 1: Public Setters

In this method, you would create public setter methods to allow external classes (like Parser) to modify the private fields of your DerivedNode like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Pros:

Flexibility: Allows for changes in field values post-creation.

Encapsulation: Supports the OO principle of hiding internal states.

Cons:

State Invariance: It breaks the invariant of the object. If you need several fields to be set in conjunction, it's easy to end up with an invalid or undefined state.

Debugging Complexity: It can make debugging and maintaining code more difficult.

Option 2: Friend Classes

Here, you would declare the Parser class as a friend of DerivedNode, allowing it to access private members directly:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Pros:

Simplicity: Direct access to internal states can make it easy to implement changes.

Cons:

Tight Coupling: It creates a strong dependency between Parser and DerivedNode, violating the principle of loose coupling.

Limited Reusability: Changes to Node could necessitate changes in Parser.

Option 3: Specific Constructors

This option encourages the use of specific constructors for initializing fields as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Pros:

Integrity: This enforces state invariance; all required fields are set at construction time.

Immutability: Encourages the development of immutable structures, simplifying debugging and testing.

Cons:

Less Flexibility: If you need to change field values, you'll need to create new instances.

Final Recommendation

After analyzing these approaches, it is evident that Option 3: Specific Constructors is the most recommended practice in modern C++. This method aligns well with the principles of object-oriented programming, allowing for a clear and manageable way to control object state. As a programmer, you’ll find that it simplifies both debugging and testing while ensuring that objects maintain a valid state throughout their lifecycle.

Conclusion

Choosing the right approach to manage access to private class fields is critical in C++. By understanding the implications of public setters, friend classes, and specific constructors, you can make informed decisions that lead to cleaner, more maintainable code. Consider your application’s needs and opt for a method that promotes state in