Скачать или смотреть How to Find an Element in a Binary Tree

Learn how to effectively search for an element in a binary tree, even if it’s not a binary search tree (BST). This guide breaks down the solution into manageable steps for better understanding.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/67725183/ asked by the user 'Astros' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/10956192/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/67725302/ provided by the user 'ChrisMM' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/10686048/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Find an element in a binary tree

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Find an Element in a Binary Tree: A Step-by-Step Guide

Searching for an element in a binary tree can be a perplexing challenge, especially if the tree isn't structured as a binary search tree (BST). Unlike a BST where elements are organized in a sorted manner, a regular binary tree has a more arbitrary layout. In this post, we will tackle your query step by step, clarifying how to successfully locate an element in a binary tree.

Understanding the Problem

Let’s visualize our binary tree to better understand the task at hand:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this binary tree, we want to locate a specific element (let's say, for instance, the element 5). The challenge lies in implementing an efficient search function that accurately navigates through the nodes of the tree.

Analyzing the Current Approach

Here’s a snippet of the code you provided for searching an element within the binary tree:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Issues Identified

Ignoring Return Values: The current implementation of the search is missing a crucial element - it doesn't account for the return values from recursive calls.

Termination of Recursion: The search function fails to stop the recursive calls if the element is found, leading to unnecessary processing.

Crafting the Solution

To refine the search function, let's make use of the values returned by recursive calls. Here’s an improved version of the function:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation of the Improved Code

This revised code works as follows:

Base Case: First, we check if the current node (T) is NULL. If it is, we return NULL, indicating there's nothing to search.

Element Check: Next, we check if the current node's element matches the target (x). If it does, we return the current node, confirming that we found what we were looking for.

Recursive Calls:

We initiate a search in the left subtree first and store the result.

If the result is not NULL (meaning the element was found), we immediately return it, stopping any further searching.

If the element isn't found in the left subtree, we proceed to search in the right subtree and return the result accordingly.

Conclusion

Now, you can effectively search for an element in any binary tree structure, ensuring your code is efficient and functional. By incorporating returns from recursive calls, your search becomes much more effective at pinpointing exactly where elements are located—dulging into the depths of the tree only as necessary.

Stay tuned for more insightful articles on data structures and algorithms that can help you navigate the complexities of computer science!