Скачать или смотреть Judge West Orders Ignition Interlock and Probation in GMO Galvin DWI Court Case

#judgewest #dwicase #ProbationSentence #CourtroomFootage #courtroomfootage #guiltyplea #IgnitionInterlock #RealCourtVideo #criminaljustice #viralcourtroom #lawandcrime #DWISentencing #truecrimecourt This courtroom hearing shows Judge West presiding over the Driving While Intoxicated case involving GMO Galvin. The defendant confirms his identity and, through his attorney Mr. Krenshaw, waives the formal reading of the indictment. The State elects to proceed only on paragraphs one and two, classifying the case as a Class A DWI offense.

Judge West explains that the charge stems from a DWI offense committed on September 28, 2024, with a prior DWI conviction dated April 30, 2014. Galvin pleads guilty and confirms the prior conviction is true. Judge West carefully verifies that the plea is entered freely and voluntarily, that Galvin reviewed and understood the signed plea documents, and that he understands he is waiving his right to appeal by accepting the agreement.

The plea agreement calls for a one-year sentence in the Jefferson County Correctional Facility, which Judge West probates for two years. Additional conditions include a $4,000 fine, one weekend in jail beginning November 28, mandatory compliance with probation rules, and installation of an ignition interlock device on any vehicle Galvin drives. The court removes the portable breath device requirement, leaving only the ignition interlock condition.

Judge West finds Galvin mentally competent, formally convicts him of DWI Second, and clearly warns that any violation of probation could result in serving the full one-year jail sentence. Galvin is instructed to remain in the courtroom to meet with the probation officer and complete required paperwork Disclaimer

This video is for educational and informational purposes only and is based on an actual courtroom transcript. It does not provide legal advice. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Viewer discretion is advised due to references to criminal charges and probation conditions.