Скачать или смотреть Mastering C+ + Metaprogramming: Choosing Types at Compile Time

Discover how to select types based on conditions during compilation in `C+ + `. Explore `if constexpr`, lambdas, and `std::tuple` for effective metaprogramming.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63646394/ asked by the user 'dasfex' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12268584/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63646495/ provided by the user 'Evg' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1625187/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to choose type from some different on compilation time?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Mastering C+ + Metaprogramming: Choosing Types at Compile Time

In the world of C+ + , particularly with the advent of C+ + 11 and later standards, metaprogramming has become an indispensable tool for developers. One common issue that arises is the need to select types based on certain conditions at compile time. This guide addresses the question: How can we choose a type based on a condition during compilation?

Problem Overview

Consider a scenario where you want to define a structure with different types based on a condition evaluated at compile time. In the example provided, we have an intention to use a conditional operator with two different types, but the standard implementation does not allow this due to type inconsistency in the ternary operator. The proposed code snippet looks like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Challenge

The challenge lies in the fact that the conditional operator (? :) cannot be used directly with variables of different types (T1 and T2). However, there are effective strategies to tackle this constraint while taking full advantage of modern C+ + features.

Solutions to Compile-Time Type Selection

Solution 1: Using if constexpr and a Lambda Function (C+ + 17)

One of the most elegant ways to handle compile-time type selection in C+ + 17 is through the if constexpr construct combined with a lambda function. Here’s how it can be implemented:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Breakdown of the Solution

Lambda Function: The lambda function allows us to encapsulate logic and execute it at compile time.

if constexpr: This feature checks the condition during compilation, ensuring that only the valid branch gets compiled, thus preventing type inconsistencies.

Solution 2: Leveraging std::tuple (C+ + 14)

For environments restricted to C+ + 14, using std::tuple is another effective workaround. Here’s how you can define the type selection:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation of This Approach

std::tuple: This STL container allows a heterogeneous collection, enabling you to store both T1 and T2.

std::get: The std::get<N % 2> retrieves the appropriate type based on the modulo operation, effectively choosing between v2 and v1.

Conclusion

Choosing types at compile-time conditions in C+ + can be accomplished efficiently using features from newer language standards. Whether you opt for the modern approach involving if constexpr and lambdas, or utilize std::tuple in C+ + 14, both methods provide reliable ways to handle type selection. This not only simplifies your code but also enhances maintainability and readability.

By mastering these techniques, you can unlock the full potential of metaprogramming in C+ + , leading to more robust and flexible code solutions.

Feel free to explore these methods in your own projects, and watch how they can simplify complex typing scenarios.