Скачать или смотреть NEWBIES | All things Affidavit & Liens

Legal beats 'law'.
Because it ain't law if its not legal.
800+ years of age old BS

Common law and 'law' is an 800 year old club of rome well executed deceptive illegal fraud.

The word legal always rules above the word law.
Law must be legal therefore lawful.

Common law is not legal, not legal is illegal.

Your signature is your legal authority, start with that.

Do you have a signed agreement with mc donalds? No so you are not under any legal obligation to mc donalds rules.
There is no legal agreement.

First rule of signatures is that no one can represent you legally without you signing over your own legal authority to them.

A lawyer cannot represent you unless you sign and agree. Neither can a politician.

No one can sign on your behalf, without your authority.

You are authority.

This law scam has ruled for over 800 years because people fall for it.

The biggest frauds in history are all these declarations, treaties etc.

No one had the legal authority to sign any of them, and no one had the legal authority to sign on behalf of anyone else.

Then they are not valid, they are not legal.

Documents signed by people on both sides who have passed away who had no legal authority to sign to begin with.

They are all historic frauds.

The state company govt office, the court, has no legal authority at all.

The court is a sub office of the govt company.

A judge has no authority unless the judge can present the material evidence of the legally agreed consent to be governed where the people have legally agreed to be governed and signed the transfer of their legal power to the representatives.

So its all a con because the government has no legal validity the representatives have no valid authority, the acts statutes and legislation cannot have force of law without your signed agreement.

The govt rules by presumption of legal authority but it has never existed.

The govt is a private company providing a judicial service for profit and gain with absolutely no legal authority to do so.

Using force to enforce without proof on record of the legal consent of the people to give force of law to the legislative rule or statute, is willful and beligerant act of terrorism.

The presumption that the legal 'consent to govern' exists is how the state company govt get away with any and everything and have done across the planet for over 800 years of 'governments'
They ALL only exist on the presumption they have the legal authority of the people.

No govt can produce any evidence to legally validate the claim it is in fact a govt.

Governments are a chain of private companies registered to the Company of London as their private assets, a gang of commercial white collar criminal terrorists.

You cant take terrorists to their own court but you can prove their court and govt has no legal authority over you, any you all yous.

Until then yous will all presume they have authority not you. They do not.