Discover whether using `updateMany` or multiple `updateOne` commands in MongoDB's bulkWrite operation is best for performance and how to avoid potential pitfalls.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/65831219/ asked by the user 'Hafez' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5394364/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/65835186/ provided by the user 'Hafez' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5394364/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: MongoDB bulkWrite multiple updateOne vs updateMany
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Unpacking MongoDB Bulk Write: updateOne vs updateMany
When working with large datasets in MongoDB, efficient data manipulation becomes crucial for performance. A common scenario arises when you need to update multiple documents that share the same update object. Should you utilize multiple updateOne operations, each targeting a specific document, or is it more efficient to combine your efforts into a single updateMany operation? In this guide, we will dissect the performance implications of each method and help you make an informed decision for your bulkWrite operations.
The Problem Statement
You face the challenge of needing to update 200,000 documents in your MongoDB collection, each with one of 10 unique statuses. The fundamental question lies in whether to send multiple updateOne commands or to merge the requests into fewer updateMany operations—keeping in mind the performance of each method and the risk of updating wrong documents.
The Options Available
Option A: Send a bulkWrite operation containing 10 updateMany commands, where each command affects 20,000 documents.
Option B: Execute a bulkWrite with 200,000 updateOne commands, each with its unique filter and corresponding status.
The Short Answer
Using updateMany can lead to performance improvements of at least twice the speed compared to using multiple updateOne commands. However, this speed comes with a caveat: the possibility of unintentionally altering more documents than intended if the filter criteria are not unique.
The Long Answer: An Experiment on Performance
To understand the performance differences better, necessary steps were taken to rig an experiment that could provide a conclusive answer.
Experiment Methodology
Setup: We created a bankaccounts MongoDB collection, each document containing a single balance field.
Data Insertion: Inserted 1 million documents into this collection.
Randomization: Randomized the order of the documents to avoid potential database optimizations.
Write Operations: Generated bulkWrite operations with varying filters.
Execution: Measured the execution time for different write operations.
Variations Tested
Variation 1: An array of 1 million updateOne operations, where each operation was unique.
Variation 2: Created 100 updateMany operations, each affecting 10,000 documents.
The Results
The experiment revealed a striking difference in execution times. The results were:
updateOne: Approximately 51.28 seconds on average.
updateMany: Only 21.04 seconds on average, rendering it 243% faster than using multiple updateOne commands!
Performance Analysis
This performance boost with updateMany could not be understated. Although the potential for errors exists when using non-unique filters, this method marked a significant improvement in operational speed.
The Risk: Potential for Mistakes
Despite the performance advantages, it is critical to understand the risks associated with using updateMany. The operation can accidentally update multiple documents if the filter is not unique.
Best Practices: Always use unique identifiers as filters, such as _id, to mitigate this risk. When utilizing non-unique fields, thoroughly assess the potential for unintended updates.
Conclusion
In summary, leveraging updateMany within a bulkWrite operation can significantly enhance your MongoDB performance, especially when dealing with extensive datasets containing similar update objects. However, it is vital to apply careful filtering to prevent unwanted changes. This ensures that while you enjoy faster write times, your data integrity remains intact.
Choose wisely between these methods based on your specific application needs, and happy coding with MongoDB!
Информация по комментариям в разработке