Discover how to solve the issue of storing file sizes in Bash using `associative arrays`, enabling dynamic variable names for easy access later.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68624895/ asked by the user 'Jesse Hix' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/15108998/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68625814/ provided by the user 'markp-fuso' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7366100/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Bash for loop with unique var names issue
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Solving the Bash For Loop Variable Name Issue
When working with Bash scripting, especially during file manipulation, you may find yourself needing to store data in a way that makes it easy to reference later. One common problem arises when you attempt to use a loop to read files from a directory, calculate some metrics (like file sizes), and then store these values in variables. This can lead to confusion, particularly when trying to assign unique variable names dynamically within the loop.
In this guide, we will address a specific issue: how to correctly capture the file sizes of multiple files in a Bash for loop, while ensuring that each file size is associated with its filename. We'll provide a clear solution to this problem using associative arrays in Bash.
Understanding the Problem
Imagine you have a directory full of files, and you want to iterate over them to determine their sizes. The user's initial approach utilized a simple array to capture the file sizes. However, this method consolidated all file sizes into a single element of the array, making further manipulation challenging.
The original code looked something like this:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
This code does not achieve the intended result of storing unique sizes associated with each file. Instead, it sums all file sizes into a single value, which is not practical for subsequent operations.
The Solution: Using Associative Arrays
To solve this challenge, we can make use of Bash's associative arrays, which allow us to store key-value pairs. In this context, the key will be the filename, and the value will be its size. Here’s how you can implement this solution:
Step-by-Step Code Breakdown
Clear Previous Values: First, we ensure that the variable name byte is unset to avoid any previous data.
Declare an Associative Array: Use declare -A to specify that we want to use an associative array.
Loop Through Files: For each file in the directory, calculate its size using wc -c and store it in the associative array using the filename as the key.
Here’s the revised version of the code:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Explanation of the Code
unset byte: This command ensures that any previous data stored in byte is erased before running the script.
declare -A byte: This line initializes byte as an associative array.
for b in /home/usr/frames/*: This syntax iterates through all the files in the specified directory.
wc -c < "${b}": This command counts the number of bytes in the file, which is then stored in the associative array under the key created from the file’s basename (using basename to strip out the path).
Sample Output
When run in a directory with a few .txt files, the above code will yield results similar to this:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
This output format allows for easy access to the file sizes later in your script.
Conclusion
By switching to an associative array in Bash, you can effectively manage multiple pieces of data without the complication of dynamically generating variable names. This approach not only improves code readability but also enhances maintainability. As you incorporate this technique into your Bash scripts, managing file sizes and other related data will become straightforward and intuitive.
Don't hesitate to implement this solution in your Bash projects or share it with others facing similar challenges!
                         
                    
Информация по комментариям в разработке