Singapore Bars Exiled Hong Kong Activist Nathan Law, Citing National Interests
In a move underscoring Singapore's delicate balancing act between democratic freedoms and ties to Beijing, authorities denied entry to prominent exiled Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Nathan Law on Saturday, despite his valid visa, deporting him after hours of detention at Changi Airport. Law, a 32-year-old former legislator and student leader of the 2014 Umbrella Movement, was en route from San Francisco to attend a "closed-door, invitation-only" conference when immigration officials referred him for questioning and security checks.
"I was detained for four hours without being asked any questions or given a reason," Law told the BBC, describing how he spent a total of 14 hours in Singapore before boarding a flight back to the U.S. on Sunday. Granted political asylum in the UK in 2020 after fleeing Hong Kong's crackdown under the National Security Law, Law holds a refugee travel document and had secured a single-entry visa three weeks prior. He suspects the refusal was "political," potentially influenced by external pressures from the People's Republic of China (PRC), though Singapore provided no direct explanation during his ordeal.
The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) confirmed the decision Monday, stating Law's "entry into and presence in the country would not be in Singapore’s national interests." A spokesperson emphasized that visa holders remain subject to on-arrival assessments, adding that Singapore "takes a clear and strong stand against the importation of politics of other countries." Law, one of eight activists with a HK$1 million ($128,000) bounty from Hong Kong police for alleged national security offenses, denied any wrongdoing, framing his work as advocacy for human rights.
This incident revives memories of Singapore's 2017 denial of entry to another Hong Kong activist, Gui Minhai, amid extradition treaty concerns—Singapore maintains such an agreement with Hong Kong, unlike nations like Germany that suspended theirs post-2020. Rights groups, including Amnesty International, condemned the move as "chilling," warning it signals eroding space for dissent in Southeast Asia. "Singapore's choice prioritizes relations with Beijing over free expression," said a spokesperson.
On X, reactions poured in: Al Jazeera English highlighted the deportation, garnering over 14,000 views, while analyst Sari Arho Havrén noted the unexplained detention. Hong Kong Free Press founder Tom Grundy shared details of the visa approval, and activist Benedict Rogers expressed relief at Law's safety but concern over the implications. Pro-Beijing voices dismissed it as routine border control, but diaspora communities decried it as "authoritarian overreach."
As U.S.-China tensions simmer, Law's rebuff highlights Singapore's pragmatic foreign policy—courting investment from both while safeguarding stability. For the global pro-democracy movement, it's a stark reminder of Beijing's long arm, even in neutral hubs.
#Desitdown #News #Hong Kong #activist #Nathan #Law #says he was #denied #entry #Singapore)
Информация по комментариям в разработке