Скачать или смотреть AI Submittal Review + Drawing Revisions Tools That Actually Work

Your submittal process is costing you more time than you think.

Between rejected submittals, missed drawing revisions, and specs that don’t match the plans, project engineers are buried in work that should not take this long.

In this live demo, I’m walking through BuildSync with their Co-Founder Tom Port to show how AI is actually fixing this stuff right now. Not in theory. Not a pitch deck. But a working tool that GCs and subs are already using on real projects.

We’ll cover the core platform plus several product updates that are worth your attention:

Automated Submittal ReviewBuildSync’s AI checks submittals against project specs before you send them in. It flags non-compliant items upfront so you’re not guessing. Teams are seeing first-pass approval rates jump from roughly one-third to north of 90%, while cutting review time by 70–80%.

Drawing Revisions ToolUpload your 50% CDs and your 90% CDs. BuildSync compares them and shows you exactly what changed. No more hunting through clouds and deltas trying to figure out what scope quietly moved. Price and build off the right set.

Spec to Drawing ComparisonBecause specs and drawings never fully agree. This tool flags gaps and conflicts early, before they turn into RFIs, rejected submittals, or late-night emails no one enjoys writing.

Submittal ReasoningWhen a submittal fails, you don’t just get a red flag. You get the why. Missing information, unmet spec requirement, or a design conflict. Faster resubmittals. Less back-and-forth. Fewer dumb loops.


If you’re a GC drowning in submittal admin, or a Subcontractor tired of getting packages kicked back, this one’s worth an hour.