QUESTIONS:
1. Does an appropriations rider whose text bars the agency’s use of certain funds to pay a statutory obligation, but does not repeal or amend the statutory obligation, in fact impliedly repeal the obligation?
2. Does the presumption against retroactivity apply to the interpretation of such an appropriations rider?
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Maine Community Health Options, Petitioners v. United States, Respondent. (No. 18-1023)
Washington, D.C. Tuesday, December 10, 2019
The above-entitled matter came on for oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States at 10:11 a.m.
APPEARANCES:
PAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ., Washington, D.C.; on behalf of the Petitioners.
EDWIN S. KNEEDLER, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; on behalf of the Respondent.
CONTENTS:
ORAL ARGUMENT OF: PAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ. On behalf of the Petitioners
ORAL ARGUMENT OF: EDWIN S. KNEEDLER, ESQ. On behalf of the Respondent
REBUTTAL ARGUMENT OF: PAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ. On behalf of the Petitioners
Transcript: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arg...
Ruling: Pending
More Info: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/18-1023
ABOUT SCOTUS-TOONS:
The SCOTUS does not allow cameras in the courtroom during oral arguments so if you want to see what happens during a Supreme Court case you have to make the video yourself.
WEBSITE: http://scotusToons.com
TWITTER: / scotustoons
REDDIT: / scotustoons
--LINKS--
TIKTOK: / danielleemeeks
TWITTER: / danielleemeeks
INSTAGRAM: / danielleemeeks
ITCH.IO: https://danielleemeeks.itch.io/
GAME JOLT: http://gamejolt.com/profile/daniellee...
TWITCH.TV: / danielleemeeks
TUMBLR: / danielleemeeks
YOUTUBE: / danielleemeeks
-TAGS-
Anime Studio Pro 12, Moho Studio Pro 12, Unity 2017, SCOTUS, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, cartoon, animation, animated, John G. Roberts, Anthony M. Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, Samuel Anthony Alito, Sonia Sotomayer, Neil M. Gorsush, Brett M. Kavanaugh
Информация по комментариям в разработке