Скачать или смотреть Exploring the Ethics of Deception: The Bogus Pipeline in Research

The "Bogus Pipeline" (BPL) method has long been debated for its ethical implications in psychological research. This study evaluates the costs and benefits of using the BPL, a deceptive tool designed to enhance self-reports’ accuracy. Here are five key takeaways:
1️⃣ BPL Increases Data Accuracy: By simulating a lie detector, the BPL reduces socially desirable responses, leading to more honest self-reports. It has proven particularly effective in sensitive topics like racial attitudes and substance use.
2️⃣ Participants Perceive Benefits Outweigh Costs: Most participants believe the benefits of BPL research—such as advancing societal knowledge—outweigh its costs. Despite potential discomfort, 72% support conducting studies using the BPL.
3️⃣ Ethics Depend on Context: The perceived ethicality of the BPL varies by study topic and participant demographics. For example, using the BPL with children raises more ethical concerns than with adult populations.
4️⃣ Deception Doesn’t Erode Trust: Contrary to critics’ fears, participants generally retain trust in researchers after learning about the deception. Effective debriefing plays a crucial role in maintaining this trust.
5️⃣ Complementing Ethics with Empiricism: Ethical debates benefit from empirical data alongside value-based discussions. This study emphasizes a utilitarian approach: deception is justified when benefits to society outweigh participant discomfort.

The Bogus Pipeline demonstrates the complexity of balancing ethical considerations and research validity. Striking this balance is essential for advancing psychology while respecting participant rights.

Get article: Aguinis, H., & Henle, C. A. 2001. Empirical assessment of the ethics of the bogus pipeline. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(2): 352-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2...