Скачать или смотреть Is it Law of Tort or Law of Torts? Part-2 | Winfield vs Salmond Debate | Judiciary Exam Perspective

In this video, Praveen Sir explains the important conceptual debate: "Law of Tort" or "Law of Torts"—a question frequently asked in Judiciary, LLB and competitive law exams. The lecture analyses both theories with case law, Indian judicial approach, and exam‑writing strategy.
​

You'll learn:

Winfield's "Law of Tort" theory: all wrongs causing damage are actionable as torts unless there is a valid defence (broader approach, supported by Indian judiciary in M.C. Mehta v. Union of India); principle of ubi jus ibi remedium (where there is a right, there is a remedy).
​

Salmond's "Law of Torts" theory (Pigeon Hole Theory): liability arises only for specific, recognised torts (narrower approach, criticised for limiting remedies).
​

Indian judicial position: preference for Winfield's broader approach; how courts apply tort principles through equity, justice, and good conscience under CPC Section 9; evolution through landmark cases.
​

Exam strategy: how to write a balanced mains answer, MCQ approach, and why this debate matters for Judiciary/APO exams.
​

Ideal for Judiciary, APO, LLB and tort law students who want conceptual clarity and exam success on this foundational topic.

#LawOfTorts #LawOfTort #WinfieldVsSalmond #JudiciaryPreparation #PraveenSirJudicialAcademy #LawInHindi