Скачать или смотреть Understanding the subscribe() vs assign() in Kafka: What’s the Difference?

Learn about the strange differences between using `subscribe()` and `assign()` methods in Kafka, their impact on message consumption, and how to improve your Kafka consumer's reliability.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/77132426/ asked by the user 'Michał Niklas' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/22595/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/77134652/ provided by the user 'Stéphane Derosiaux' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/529398/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Strange difference between reading from kafka topic using subscribe() and assign()

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the subscribe() vs assign() in Kafka: What’s the Difference?

When working with Kafka, a common task is counting messages in topics. However, many developers encounter a puzzling issue when using the subscribe() and assign() methods to consume messages. In this guide, we’ll explore the differences between these two methods, the challenges you might face, and solutions to improve your Kafka consumer's performance.

The Problem: Confusion Between Subscribe and Assign

What are subscribe() and assign()?

subscribe(): Automatically manages the partitions of the topic for you, allowing the consumer to dynamically adjust to partition changes.

assign(): Offers manual control over the specific partitions the consumer will read from, which can be useful but comes with a trade-off in flexibility.

Real-World Scenario

Imagine you’re tasked with counting messages in Kafka topics where some topics have multiple partitions. You implement two approaches — using subscribe() and assign() — but you notice strange behaviors and inconsistencies on different machines:

On some machines, subscribe() fails to read any messages, while on others it works perfectly.

Conversely, assign() works across machines but seems to miss some messages when dealing with multiple partitions.

This leads to frustration and confusion, leaving you to question if the issue lies within your code or the environment.

Investigation and Findings

Initial Testing

Despite consistent implementation across machines, the outcomes varied. Here’s a summary based on tests from different environments:

Machines 1 and 2: Both subscribe() and assign() worked well, counting all messages as expected.

Machines 3 and 4: subscribe() read zero messages, while assign() was partially successful, reading from some partitions only.

The results highlight that while assign() appears to be a fallback option, it does not guarantee consistent message consumption across all partitions or environments.

Insights from Kafka's Functionality

It's crucial to understand that Kafka does not guarantee that the poll() call will always return records, even if records are known to exist. The reality is that various broker optimizations can impact the results of these calls.

Solution: Enhancing the Message Counting Strategy

To maximize the efficiency of message counting in Kafka, it’s essential to improve your approach to polling for messages:

Implement a Retry Strategy

Instead of ceasing execution when the poll() method returns no records, you should implement a retry mechanism. This involves checking if X consecutive polls return empty results, at which point, you can safely exit the loop. Here's an enhanced version of the count_messages() function:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Key Considerations

Poll Timeout: A timeout in the poll() method ensures your application doesn’t hang indefinitely.

Visibility into Partitions: Using assign() gives you visibility into which partitions are being read. However, it is vital to keep an eye on the message counts to ensure all messages are accounted for.

Conclusion: Balancing subscribe() and assign()

Each method of consuming messages in Kafka has its benefits and pitfalls. While subscribe() simplifies management and dynamically adapts to changes, assign() provides control but can lead to missed messages in certain environments.

By incorporating a retry strategy in your polling approach, you can mitigate some of the inconsistencies observed when using these methods. As you develop and test your applications, remember that careful handling of Kafka’s consumer API can lead to more reliable message