Скачать или смотреть Attorney TAUNTS The Judge… Until He HUMILIATES Him Instantly

What happens when a defense attorney tries to bluff a judge — and gets fact-checked in real time?

In this intense courtroom exchange, Judge Simpson calls out an attorney after discovering serious inconsistencies in his argument. What started as a motion to recuse quickly turned into a credibility crisis. From questionable case citations to a disputed claim about a prior preliminary exam, the judge pauses proceedings, checks the record, and returns with receipts.

This video breaks down:
The legal issue surrounding search warrants vs. preliminary examinations
The attempted use of People v. Burrell
The credibility collapse once the record was reviewed
Why written motions matter in high-stakes hearings
And whether the judge should have ruled immediately

When courtroom advocacy crosses into misrepresentation, things escalate fast. The real question is — was this strategy, sloppy preparation, or something worse?

Watch until the end and let me know:
Should the judge have ruled on the spot? Or was giving time to file a written motion the right call?

⚖️ Disclaimer

This video is for educational and commentary purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. All opinions expressed are based on publicly available courtroom proceedings and are intended for analysis and discussion.#SovereignCitizen #Karen #SovCit #Arrested #SovCitLogic #CourtMeltdown #JudgeSimpson #JudgeFleischer #JudgeOakley #JudgeBoyd #JudgePerkins #JudgeMiddleton #BodycamFootage #courtroomtips