Скачать или смотреть How Misinformation Engineers Reality: From Science Journals to Political Hate

Details the mechanism of misinformation.
Core Tactic: Exploiting institutional trust and brand prestige to manufacture authority and simplify complex realities.
Case Study 1: Scientific Communication
Flagship Journals (e.g. Nature): Rigorous editorial firewalls, select for universal significance.
High-Volume Journals (e.g. Scientific Reports): Prioritize technical soundness, not significance.
The Exploit: Misinformation leverages the brand (Nature) without meeting flagship standards, borrowing false credibility.
Case Study 2: Political & Social Arenas (Southeast Asia)
Method: Elite-driven online hate speech targeting minorities.
Process:
1. Spread broad conspiracy theories.
2. Disseminate specific misinformation.
3. Cultivate collective victimhood.
4. Position populist leaders as sole spokespersons.
Result: Complex issues are reduced to binary oppositions, fostering an addiction to emotional explanations and a rejection of nuanced politics, leading to dangerous real-world consequences.

Explains how misinformation exploits institutional trust and brand prestige by manufacturing authority and simplifying complex realities. It details this mechanism in scientific communication, distinguishing between highly selective flagship journals like Nature, which employ rigorous editorial firewalls for universal significance, and high-volume open-access journals like Scientific Reports, which prioritize technical soundness. Misinformation leverages the broad brand name without adhering to the flagship journal's stringent standards, thereby borrowing false credibility. The video then applies this same psychological engineering to political and social arenas, particularly in Southeast Asia, where elite-driven online hate speech targets minority groups by exploiting historical tensions. This process involves spreading broad conspiracy theories, disseminating specific misinformation, cultivating collective victimhood, and positioning populist leaders as sole spokespersons for a 'fabricated will of the people.' This strategy simplifies complex issues into binary oppositions, leading to an addiction to emotional explanations and a rejection of nuanced politics, often with dangerous real-world consequences.