Скачать или смотреть Understanding MySQL Cluster (NDB) for Efficient Data Distribution Across Multiple Servers

Learn how to effectively use `MySQL Cluster (NDB)` to spread data across multiple servers, understand the advantages over InnoDB, and clarify the use of partitions.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/77589399/ asked by the user 'HelloGUI' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/21448908/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/77605427/ provided by the user 'Mauritz Sundell' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3504629/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: MySQL Cluster (NDB) spread data (rows) to 4 data-nodes servers

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Maximizing Efficiency: Using MySQL Cluster (NDB) to Spread Data Across Multiple Servers

In the realm of database management, data distribution is a critical aspect that can significantly affect performance and scalability. When it comes to MySQL, utilizing a cluster can facilitate spreading data across multiple nodes, enhancing both availability and access speeds. This guide addresses a common question regarding the setup and benefits of using MySQL Cluster (NDB) to spread data across four data-node servers.

The Challenge: Spreading Rows Across Multiple Data Nodes

Imagine you have a MySQL database and want to utilize the power of horizontal sharding to balance the load across four data nodes. Each node should not just replicate the data but instead, hold unique rows to maximize efficiency. This user set up a MySQL Cluster using NDB, aiming to spread data while minimizing redundancy. The configuration directly involves defining the number of replicas and how data is partitioned.

Here’s a summary of the user’s concerns:

Data spreading: Is it rightly set to spread data across four nodes without redundancy?

Comparison with InnoDB: What are the differences in using NDB for data distribution versus InnoDB's foreign partitions?

Partitions with NDB: Can we create partitions in an NDB table and, if so, how do they function?

Understanding the Solution: Spreading Data with NDB

Spreading Rows Across Four Data Nodes

By setting NoOfReplicas=1 in the NDB configuration, the user successfully enabled the system to spread data across four data nodes. Each row of data will only exist on a single data node, ensuring there is no replication taking up additional space. However, it is vital to understand a few implications:

High Availability: Setting the replicas to one compromises the high availability features of the NDB cluster. If any single node fails, the entire cluster might go offline. Therefore, while data spreading is achieved, caution is needed regarding availability and fault tolerance.

Creating Partitions: The Case with NDB

When explicitly stating to have 8 partitions for a particular NDB table, it leads to each of the four data nodes holding two partitions. Importantly, several considerations must be taken into account:

Dynamic Partitioning: It is recommended to avoid explicitly defining partition counts in NDB. Instead, using default partitioning allows the system to dynamically manage partitioning based on the total number of data nodes and their configurations. This enhances scalability and accommodates future growth without manual intervention.

NDB vs. InnoDB: Key Differences

While both NDB and InnoDB can accommodate distributed systems, they operate quite differently:

Transparency of Distribution: NDB operates as a distributed database system that does not require applications to manage the distribution of data. This makes it easier for developers since they can interact with a singular MySQL server without worrying about which specific data node is hosting particular rows.

Transaction Handling: Transactions in an NDB can span across multiple data nodes, allowing for distributed transactions. In contrast, InnoDB requires applications to handle connections to the right server if accessing rows on different nodes, which can complicate design.

Conclusion: Is NDB the Right Choice for You?

If your goal is to spread data across multiple servers efficiently without redundancy while enjoying the seamless interaction of a single interface, MySQL Cluster (NDB) is a commendable choice. As outlined above, although it involves careful consideration concerning configurations and high availability, the data distribution and transaction handling