Скачать или смотреть Understanding the Difference Between Iterating with Strings and Integers in Python

Explore why iterating with a string successfully counts holes in digits while integers fail in this detailed Python programming guide.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62714050/ asked by the user 'pizza123' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/11499320/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62714178/ provided by the user 'Youyoun' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13791575/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Is there a reason why iterating with a string works, but iterating with an integer does not?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Is There a Reason Why Iterating with a String Works, but Iterating with an Integer Does Not?

In Python programming, iterating through different data types can yield varying results, especially when processing numbers as characters (strings) versus integers. This behavior can become particularly important in situations where you're analyzing digits, as seen in our recent inquiry concerning counting the so-called "holes" within whole numbers.

The Problem Statement

The task is to calculate the total number of "holes" present within numbers ranging from 0 to N, where specific digits represent a certain number of holes. For instance:

Digits with 1 hole: 0, 4, 6, 9

Digit with 2 holes: 8

As part of this exploration, we came across two different functions aimed at achieving the same goal, but yielding divergent results. Let's dive into their workings.

Analyzing the Functions

Function 1: The Correct Approach

Here’s the first function that accurately computes the holes:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation:

This function converts each number within the given range to a string.

It then iterates through each digit, checking how many holes are present.

This approach correctly counts the holes as it inspects each digit individually.

Function 2: The Incorrect Approach

Now, let’s look at the second function that does not work as intended:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation:

Unlike the first function, this one does not convert the number to a string.

Instead, it checks if the entire number corresponds to one of the hole numbers, thus missing out on counting holes present in digits that compose larger numbers.

Therefore, when N 10, the loop evaluates entire numbers (e.g., 200), which do not equate to simple holes, leading to an incorrect total (consistently returning 6).

Understanding the Output

When N 10, the second function always produces an answer of 6. This is because it adds up counts for digits 0, 4, 6, 8, and 9 up to 10, which only captures those specific numbers and not their compositions (like 20, 30, etc.).

Why does this happen?

The main issue lies in:

Lack of Iteration Over Individual Digits: The second function evaluates the whole number, checking if it matches one from the predefined list of hole digits. It misses anything beyond single-digit values.

Static Count Output: Attempts to check multi-digit numbers fall short, leading to inaccurate counts over broader ranges.

Conclusion

In summary, when programming in Python with integers and strings, understand how you iterate through these data types impacts your results. If your intention is to analyze each digit independently, converting numbers into strings helps achieve that precision. This distinction clarifies why the first function delivers correct results while the second does not.

Always review the logic flow of your code and ensure that you're examining each necessary component when working with numerical data!